
Stramm8
Active member
Didn't you buy this through a dealer?? If so, seems like they would be on the hook for all of this BS. In any event, I'm confident it will be as good as new if not better when its all said and done. 

Shawn Lutz":386oylh9 said:I'd be inclined send a copy of the invoice to Gibson's Legal team as someone is out there building 59 replicas and logoing them as Gibson's![]()
steve_k":1na6yfet said:
steve_k":2yro762u said:To answer a bunch of questions:
- With the Gibson lawsuit, I was advised to be a little concerned of shipping the guitar out/in as there may be a Customs flag and could be confiscated.
- Gil is not covering the work. He considers his job to be done.
- I am covering the repair work and shipping.
- Gil is still making 59 Replica's. I was led to believe otherwise.
- Replacing the set neck requires a lot of work and refinishing. Same amount of time and effort to build a new one. That said, I am on my own.
- Refund not possible. He blames the shipping company. It was suggested by Gil that I make a fraudulent claim against them. What?
- I still have a couple of cards to play.
- Gil was pretty good to work with, right up until the point of final payment.
- Right now, I wouldn't let him change the strings on my fucking guitar.
- My asshole still hurts from the reaming and no lube.
steve_k":ms2mcjuj said:To answer a bunch of questions:
- With the Gibson lawsuit, I was advised to be a little concerned of shipping the guitar out/in as there may be a Customs flag and could be confiscated.
- Gil is not covering the work. He considers his job to be done.
- I am covering the repair work and shipping.
- Gil is still making 59 Replica's. I was led to believe otherwise.
- Replacing the set neck requires a lot of work and refinishing. Same amount of time and effort to build a new one. That said, I am on my own.
- Refund not possible. He blames the shipping company. It was suggested by Gil that I make a fraudulent claim against them. What?
- I still have a couple of cards to play.
- Gil was pretty good to work with, right up until the point of final payment.
- Right now, I wouldn't let him change the strings on my fucking guitar.
- My asshole still hurts from the reaming and no lube.
sah5150":1yeagzit said:My mind is blown...steve_k":1yeagzit said:To answer a bunch of questions:
- With the Gibson lawsuit, I was advised to be a little concerned of shipping the guitar out/in as there may be a Customs flag and could be confiscated.
- Gil is not covering the work. He considers his job to be done.
- I am covering the repair work and shipping.
- Gil is still making 59 Replica's. I was led to believe otherwise.
- Replacing the set neck requires a lot of work and refinishing. Same amount of time and effort to build a new one. That said, I am on my own.
- Refund not possible. He blames the shipping company. It was suggested by Gil that I make a fraudulent claim against them. What?
- I still have a couple of cards to play.
- Gil was pretty good to work with, right up until the point of final payment.
- Right now, I wouldn't let him change the strings on my fucking guitar.
- My asshole still hurts from the reaming and no lube.![]()
Steve
Not Gibson logo'd. It says "Gilyaron" in Gibson-like script. It DOES NOT say Gibson...Bob Savage":2pph8fyt said:Shawn Lutz":2pph8fyt said:I'd be inclined send a copy of the invoice to Gibson's Legal team as someone is out there building 59 replicas and logoing them as Gibson's![]()
So these are being logo'd as Gibson? I asked that in another thread and the answer was they use the Gibson typeset but say Gil Yaron.
Absolutely, the problem is that of the shipper, not the receiver of the product. Not tooting my horn, but my 4x12s were built by a third party until I found a local cab guy and they were drop shipped to the customer rather than shipping them to me and having me re-ship them (which is just another chance for shipping disaster). One customer received a cab and it was damaged on the bottom - really just cosmetic - but that is irrelevant. The customer was rightfully bummed and I immediately got on the phone with my builder as soon as the customer contacted me. Between myself and the builder we were ready to have an inspector to the customer's house the next day, identified appropriate forms and were ready to provide a shipping account to have the cab sent back so it could be repaired/replaced. For his own reasons, the customer decided it was best to just keep the cab, but I wanted him to be a satisfied customer, so since the shipping had been poor, I offered to refund the $150 he paid in shipping as a good faith gesture. The customer accepted and was appreciative. I basically ate my margin on the cab, but the bottom line is that this business (boutique, high value gear) is about SATISFYING THE CUSTOMER. I could have told the guy to send the cab back or done nothing when he decided to keep it, but I didn't do that because my rep matters to me. It wasn't my fault and it wasn't my builder's fault either as he ships many cabs without incident and he knows how to pack them... Shit just happens sometimes and how you treat the customer and how you satisfy them is job one...Shawn Lutz":2cjrpus6 said:sounds like GY is a douchebag to me. Did his company NOT ship this guitar? It IS his fucking problem.
I think if I got that kind of answer out of the guy I'd be going postal on his ass. Karma is a bitch but I'd be inclined send a copy of the invoice to Gibson's Legal team as someone is out there building 59 replicas and logoing them as Gibson's![]()
steve_k":3th9jczc said:
sah5150":h9g33bm5 said:As far as making as Les Paul clone, I think it's hilarious that guys are talking about "stealing a design" here. Please... it is Gibson that is being ridiculous trying to protect a 60+ year old design NOW. There have been a million Les Paul clones made by a million guitar companies. ..... Everyone sell your Edwards LPs then. .....Singling out Yaron as stealing is ridiculous.
sah5150":3nqdvrj7 said:As far as making as Les Paul clone, I think it's hilarious that guys are talking about "stealing a design" here. Please... it is Gibson that is being ridiculous trying to protect a 60+ year old design NOW. There have been a million Les Paul clones made by a million guitar companies. Singling out Yaron as stealing is ridiculous. It's public domain at this point even with a patent and let's face it their isn't one.