I like Rig Talk...but

[JohnnyGtar]

That won't get them bant.

It's tasteless, but it doesn't meet the qualification that one must state that this or that "race" is inferior.

That will get you bant.


100%

They either apologise and withdraw or they're bant.

Shouldn't be allowed in the first place bro, but I'm not in charge. Why would "Jew lover" not be ban worthy? It's clearly meant as an insult.

 

[Geo]

Shouldn't be allowed in the first place bro, but I'm not in charge. Why would "Jew lover" not be ban worthy? It's clearly meant as an insult.

Not sure about that, I love many Jews.

 

[MadAsAHatter]

I just going to throw this out there.

See the bolded part.
From the OTC Rebooted rules:

I'd say there are a couple of select individuals who have violated this rule multiple times over with no consequence.

 

[VonBonfire]

I just going to throw this out there.

See the bolded part.
From the OTC Rebooted rules:

View attachment 448733

I'd say there are a couple of select individuals who have violated this rule multiple times over with no consequence.

I think "continually" is the operative word there and I can only think of one member who was a dick without any breaks and he got banned.

 

[Geo]

and he got banned.

Was he in this picture?

 

[Monkey Man]

I just going to throw this out there.

See the bolded part.
From the OTC Rebooted rules:

View attachment 448733

I'd say there are a couple of select individuals who have violated this rule multiple times over with no consequence.

To the casual observer it's obviously a grey area and TBH I've often thought about removing it altogether. I like clarity. Grey areas, not-so-much.

Note that it says, "... with obvious intentions of spoiling the fun for ALL others".

The worst perpetrator in this regard has been bant multiple times and returned. In his defence, "spoiling the fun for everyone" is from the POV of many not what he's done 'cause they find his toungue-in-cheek ad-hom funny. The number of likes he receives for it says all you need to know.

To "spoil the fun for everyone" one would literally have to insult, in a serious way (not joking), everyone. Accusing the entire forum of being PDFs is a clearcut example of this and as you'd know someone was bant last year for that... twice, the second time permanently.

Shouldn't be allowed in the first place bro, but I'm not in charge. Why would "Jew lover" not be ban worthy? It's clearly meant as an insult.

Hundreds of different statements and nicknames are meant as insults brother.

What can I tell ya; they happen in the locker room on an almost-constant basis.

Some who never engage in that sort of thing don't even receive them but those who get into the argy-bargy know what to expect.

 

[JohnnyGtar]

To the casual observer it's obviously a grey area and TBH I've often thought about removing it altogether. I like clarity. Grey areas, not-so-much.

Note that it says, "... with obvious intentions of spoiling the fun for ALL others".

The worst perpetrator in this regard has been bant multiple times and returned. In his defence, "spoiling the fun for everyone" is from the POV of many not what he's done 'cause they find his toungue-in-cheek ad-hom funny. The number of likes he receives for it says all you need to know.

To "spoil the fun for everyone" one would literally have to insult, in a serious way (not joking), everyone. Accusing the entire forum of being PDFs is a clearcut example of this and as you'd know someone was bant last year for that... twice, the second time permanently.


Hundreds of different statements and nicknames are meant as insults brother.

What can I tell ya; they happen in the locker room on an almost-constant basis.

Some who never engage in that sort of thing don't even receive them but those who get into the argy-bargy know what to expect.

Hi MM,

Bro, I think you're a great guy, but you make far too many excuses for outrageous bullshit on R/T.

Please delete my account. Don't put it on standby. Delete it. Thanks.

All the best to you and yours!

Johnny