ICE murdered an innocent woman

It is hard to believe anything without some sort of bias I agree but common sense does take over our thoughts sometimes right?
Yes
But "common sense" is not evidence beyond a reasonable doubt of a crime. There is a huge difference.
 
She was invited in by capitol police.
Riiiight...
1767891515300.gif
 
You know it's interesting as many people on here who contribute to these threads, while many I don't agree with , at the very least have a thought process and can actually form a full sentence of thoughts and opinions , but you have none of those skills whatsoever

You never even offer anything remotely interesting to any of the threads you post on, so I'm actually convinced that your a 5 year old who has been left alone as your parents try to pretend you don't exist. Fucking Moron!
Woke George Lynch is getting angry, what a fucking moron! :ROFLMAO:
 
Most of these ICE agents were hired off the street with not background check, not actual training, and many I suspect like to beat people up... just looking for a reason, with that said I'm sure some of them are decent human beings and are the ones who have been quitting and walking away because they have a conscience.
This might be one of the stupidest and irresponsible posts I've seen in quite a long time. It's shithead posts like this that can snowball and fan the flames.
 
If thats too much to absorb? Here is a good takeaway from the article

While the low quality of ICE recruits is making it harder for them to hit their target, it also means the ones they do hire are likely to be less qualified, and thus more likely to do even more harm when deployed.

They are increasing finding it hard to hire qualified candidates so they are lowing the minimum requirements more now just to get anyone to work.

Do I even need to make the comment that the article is an opinion piece and not a factual report?

It mostly talked about budget and recruiting numbers which has nothing to do with quality of training.
It mentioned lowering the minimum age limit, but 1. did not specify which jobs it did that for and 2. lowered it to 18; a legal adult. The same age as military and some LE offices. Again, this has nothing to to with quality of training.

The only small point of contention was this which goes along with your 2nd post I quoted...

1767892832386.png


Yes I even read the articles that were linked. Nothing addressed actual training. It says some recruits weren't able to meet physical standards and/or some failed tests. However it completely failed to address what happens after. If it's like every other LE training program they don't move forward until they can pass or eventually wash out. They don't just toss everything in the trash and let unqualified officers into the field. One more thing, it didn't address at which part of the recruitment/training process these tests took place. Was it the first, last or any day in between of training. To interject some hyperbole to make a point; you wouldn't expect to pass every homework assignment and test on your first day of class would you?

Oh, and that linked ABC news article also did more dishonest reporting. The beginning talked about recruits starting the training program before fully vetted. That is to say so the process could be shortened by getting a jump on training it while waiting for vetting results. It made a half-hearted onc sentence mention that anyone who failed the vetting process was dismisses; ie. did not continue training et alone go into the field. But of course it portrayed it like ICE was letting criminals into their ranks.

This is 100% the no IQ, emotionally driven, intellectually dishonest shitlibery I was talking about in one of my earlier posts. Not even counting these articles are opinion pieces, the "facts" that are used are not the full truth. This is the type of shit those with zero critical thinking ability lap up and regurgitate as full factual evidence like the dimwitted NPC's they are. Oh look this opinion article with half truths reenforces my NPC opinion. I better get on my morally superior high horse and start lecturing these half truth opinion pieces to everyone. It's more than past time to cut the crap.
 
Last edited:
Do I even need to make the comment that the article is an opinion piece and not a factual report?

It mostly talked about budget and recruiting numbers which has nothing to do with quality of training.
It mentioned lowering the minimum age limit, but 1. did not specify which jobs it did that for and 2. lowered it to 18; a legal adult. The same age as military and some LE offices. Again, this has nothing to to with quality of training.

The only small point of contention was this which goes along with your 2nd post I quoted...

View attachment 428467

Yes I even read the articles that were linked. Nothing addressed actual training. It says some recruits weren't able to meet physical standards and/or some failed tests. However it completely failed to address what happens after. If it's like every other LE training program they don't move forward until they can pass or eventually wash out. They don't just toss everything in the trash and let unqualified officers into the field. One more thing, it didn't address at which part of the recruitment/training process these tests took place. Was it the first, last or any day in between of training. To interject some hyperbole to make a point; you wouldn't expect to pass every homework assignment and test on your first day of class would you?

Oh, and that linked ABC news article also did more dishonest reporting. The beginning talked about recruits starting the training program before fully vetted. That is to say so the process could be shortened by getting a jump on training it while waiting for vetting results. It made a half-hearted onc sentence mention that anyone who failed the vetting process was dismisses; ie. did not continue training et alone go into the field.

This is 100% the no IQ, emotionally driven, intellectually dishonest shitlibery I was talking about in one of my earlier posts. Not even counting these articles are opinion pieces, the "facts" that are used are not the full truth. This is the type of shit those with zero critical thinking ability lap up and regurgitate as full factual evidence like the dimwitted NPC's they are. Oh look this opinion article with half truths reenforces my NPC opinion. I better get on my morally superior high horse and start lecturing these half truth opinion pieces to everyone. It's more than past time to cut the crap.
When I mentioned lowering hiring standards in a previous pot, these dipshits will read that as letting anyone or anybody on the job. My point was that some, not every department, mostly in DEI friendly cities, have done things such as lower minimum test scores on entry exams and overlook previously disqualifying factors such as shoplifting as a minor or marijuana use. Any department of size and worth DOES NOT forgo a background check on a recruit. There is too much liability. Can something get missed? Sure. But that's the exception. Not the norm.
To make a post implying that is just ignorant.
 
Babitt had illegally broken in to the US Capitol building, to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power, and was in the process of breaking into the Senate chamber. And was part of a violent mob. The officer had reason to suspect that she had violent intentions towards the elected officials behind that door.
I hear you but she didn't have a weapon and the woman ICE iced did have a weapon of did you forget that?

Yes, I wouldn't have shot her to death myself but I wasn't there.
 
Back
Top