CrazyNutz":1dcmfzy2 said:
FourT6and2":1dcmfzy2 said:
Old thread, sorry. but still relevant for those interested.
I have two Bogner 4x12s. One with insulation and one with it removed. Without the insulation, the cab is more "alive." It resonants more. It sounds deeper, as in slightly farther away (in a good way). With the insulation, the whole cab is dampened a bit. The attack is faster, yes. But the sound is also more in your face and present. Maybe a good way of putting it is that it's like a room mic vs a mic right up against the cone.
I just picked up a used Bogner 4x12 v30s. I notice it is stiffer than my recto 4x12, and my mojo 4x12. It's also a bit muffled, and it feels harder to play. Now that being said it really comes alive when cranked, and with more mids added. I also have to crank the amp a little more to get the same perceived volume as my other cabs.
What do you like better, with batting, or without?
Before I answer your question, I've got one for you haha:
What is the total impedance on this cab? And what is the total impedance on your other cabs? I'm guessing the Bogner is 16ohms, the Mesa is 8ohms, and the Mojo... no idea. But the volume thing is most likely a result of the different impedances between the cabs. The insulation does make the cab 'feel' a bit stiffer I think. Cranking the amp will always help any situation

I like some of my amps through one cab without the insulation and some other amps through another cab WITH the insulation. So it really depends on the sound you're going for.