Libtard village in Seattle.

[Findthetone1]

Don't worry, the reaming we gave you (and continue to give) will eventually heal. But only if you stop saying stupid shit. I know - virtually impossible task but who knows - you might have it in you.

The fact that you even think that bugs me shows just how fucking stupid you are.

 

[VonBonfire]

There has been plenty of opportunity given. We all pave our own path, and nothing is guaranteed. Excuses for poor choices and choosing a life of crime are just that. Excuses for shitty life choices, lack of self accountabilty and just fucking laziness.

Are you from a two parent home? Did you grow up middle class? It's easy to say these things if you are someone who was blessed with a situation that enabled you to make better life choices. I'm all for enabling people to have those same opportunities that we have had. Somehow you aren't, which is akin to the brain rot we see throughout society today.

And you can think a DWI multi-offender is "victimless". Until it's not.

All DWI's where there is no injury or property damage are victimless crimes. Waste of resources to incarcerate. 21 people in Texas are serving life sentences for repeat DWI's where no person or property was ever damaged or injured.

Quotas are illegal. Show me something, because I am genuinely interested. Otherwise, you are just talking out of your ass again.

Go look it up, or are you unable to google for yourself? State and Federal prisons have contracts that result in financial fines for not having a minimum number of beds filled. The quota system is illegal for local jails but not private state and federal prisons. You seem to be having a hard time dealing with well established facts.

 

[Findthetone1]

Are you from a two parent home? Did you grow up middle class? It's easy to say these things if you are someone who was blessed with a situation that enabled you to make better life choices. I'm all for enabling people to have those same opportunities that we have had. Somehow you aren't, which is akin to the brain rot we see throughout society today.

Mom divorced at 2 but remarried. Lived in 8 states and went to 25 schools in 12 years. First job was at 13. Was it middle class? Yes, but I would say lower and NOTHING was handed to me and any failures or shortcomings I have rest solely on my choices. Again, you're just giving excuses.

All DWI's where there is no injury or property damage are victimless crimes. Waste of resources to incarcerate. 21 people in Texas are serving life sentences for repeat DWI's where no person or property was ever damaged or injured.

I'll say it again, until it's not. Until that person that has had 10-15 DWI arrests, drives impaired once more and veers left of center, or runs a light or stop sign and kills someone or multiple people, possibly someone you know or love. If you've been arrested that many times for it, you don't care or are too fucking stupid to learn and belong incarcerated.

Go look it up, or are you unable to google for yourself? State and Federal prisons have contracts that result in financial fines for not having a minimum number of beds filled. The quota system is illegal for local jails but not private state and federal prisons. You seem to be having a hard time dealing with well established facts.

This is your allegation, not mine. The burden of proof is not on me.

 

[Shevek]

I'll say it again, until it's not. Until that person that has had 10-15 DWI arrests, drives impaired once more and veers left of center, or runs a light or stop sign and kills someone or multiple people, possibly someone you know or love. If you've been arrested that many times for it, you don't care or are too fucking stupid to learn and belong incarcerated.

I agree with the cop on this one.

 

[VonBonfire]

Mom divorced at 2 but remarried. Lived in 8 states and went to 25 schools in 12 years. First job was at 13. Was it middle class? Yes, but I would say lower and NOTHING was handed to me and any failures or shortcomings I have rest solely on my choices. Again, you're just giving excuses.

I'm saying people from middle class two parent families are statistically more likely to not do prison sentences and earn more money. If we had a larger middle class, we would have a more successful, productive society, with fewer people sitting in prisons. It's weird to hear a supposed conservative arguing against bolstering the middle class but somehow not surprising considering the brain rot indwelling in the average citizen now.

I'll say it again, until it's not. Until that person that has had 10-15 DWI arrests, drives impaired once more and veers left of center, or runs a light or stop sign and kills someone or multiple people, possibly someone you know or love. If you've been arrested that many times for it, you don't care or are too fucking stupid to learn and belong incarcerated.

Speculative. Most people who drive drunk will not injure anyone else or damage any property. A small fraction of a percent do. Meanwhile many people will text and drive, which has been shown to be as or more dangerous to driving drunk in terms of causing crashes and injuries so I'd assume you'd support life sentecnes for people who are habitually texting and driving. More prisoners. This is where your argument falls apart.

This is your allegation, not mine. The burden of proof is not on me.

Too lazy to be bothered. Well, I'm not gonna spoon feed it to you. bUrDeN oF pr00f

 

[Findthetone1]

I'm saying people from middle class two parent families are statistically more likely to not do prison sentences and earn more money. If we had a larger middle class, we would have a more successful, productive society, with fewer people sitting in prisons. It's weird to hear a supposed conservative arguing against bolstering the middle class but somehow not surprising considering the brain rot indwelling in the average citizen now.

People that don't break the law are statistically more likely to not do prison sentences. It's pretty simple. Trying to imply I'm against bolstering the middle class is laughable and desperate. I'm against continuous excuses. But excuse on.

Speculative. Most people who drive drunk will not injure anyone else or damage any property. A small fraction of a percent do. Meanwhile many people will text and drive, which has been shown to be as or more dangerous to driving drunk in terms of causing crashes and injuries so I'd assume you'd support life sentecnes for people who are habitually texting and driving. More prisoners. This is where your argument falls apart.

I have no words for your ignorance. Well, except, "I have no words for your ignorance"

Too lazy to be bothered. Well, I'm not gonna spoon feed it to you. bUrDeN oF pr00f

Talking out of your ass it is then

 

[BillsBigEgo]

Suckas still engaging in the side show act that is politics, thinking that if "their guy" wins, that everything is going to be great. No amount of voting is going to fix the problem. Action is the only thing that is going to fix the problem. Politicians (red and blue) sold the middle class down the river a long time ago. But keep voting suckas and watch NOTHING change.

Here comes the "but it's better to have Trump" than some democRAT. True. Trump sealed the border. Congrats. That's his legacy and about the only thing the fucktard did to improve the country. That's it.

 

[VonBonfire]

People that don't break the law are statistically more likely to not do prison sentences. It's pretty simple. Trying to imply I'm against bolstering the middle class is laughable and desperate. I'm against continuous excuses. But excuse on.

Yes, agreed. And statistically the middle class are less likely to do prison time. Circumstances do influence life choices as much as you seem to be arguing against that.

I have no words for your ignorance. Well, except, "I have no words for your ignorance"

bUrDeN oF pRooF

Texting and driving is as or more dangerous than DWI's so you sidestepped the argument, probably because you text and drive in your squad car. Have a nice day, officer.

Talking out of your ass it is then

You won't look it up since it shatters your preconceived ideas.

 

[Findthetone1]

Yes, agreed. And statistically the middle class are less likely to do prison time. Circumstances do influence life choices as much as you seem to be arguing against that.

So does knowing right from wrong and accepting accountability.

Texting and driving is as or more dangerous than DWI's so you sidestepped the argument, probably because you text and drive in your squad car. Have a nice day, officer.

Weak. I didn't sidestep anything. I'm all for hammering texting and driving. Happy? And I'm not in a squad car. Hate to burst your bubble. But since we're on the subject, what is your profession?

You won't look it up since it shatters your preconceived ideas.

Weak again. I told you I'm interested in it. It's your statement. Educate me, professor.

 

[VonBonfire]

So does knowing right from wrong and accepting accountability.

Of course. The problem is people from broken homes and the bottom income bracket are less likely to make good choices. Fix the single parent home situation, bolster the middle class, and the problem is reduced. You asked me my suggestion for fixing it, now it seems like you are saying my suggestions won't have any effect. Does that seem accurate?

Weak. I didn't sidestep anything. I'm all for hammering texting and driving. Happy? And I'm not in a squad car. Hate to burst your bubble. But since we're on the subject, what is your profession?

That's better. I can accept consistency even though I don't agree with it.

I am by trade a blues musician. During off days, most days, I work on my own place since it ultimately will make me more money than working the handyman and menial jobs for other people. I'm nearly finished at which point I'll probably find part time work at a car wash or something chill like that. Part time jobs are hard to come by here.

I'm thinking about downsizing and buying a cheaper place in the deep south and a vacation home or two in eastern europe in the coming couple years. I'm not really sure, I gotta nice place and no mortgage. I'm open to ideas if you have any.

Weak again. I told you I'm interested in it. It's your statement. Educate me, professor.

Wanting that welfare check of knowledge eh?

AI Overview


Yes, many private prison contracts with state and local governments include minimum occupancy clauses (also called "bed guarantees" or "lockup quotas"). [1, 2]

• The Quotas: Roughly 65% to 75% of private prison contracts require a state or local government to maintain between 80% and 100% of the facility's beds filled. [1, 2]
• The Penalties: If the prison population drops below that threshold, the government must still pay the private company for the empty beds (often at the full per-diem rate). [1, 2]

 

[VonBonfire]

.....cont

The private entities that benefit most from these minimum occupancy clauses are for-profit prison corporations, their executive leadership, and their Wall Street shareholders.

Because these companies operate on a business model where more inmates equal more revenue, lockup quotas guarantee stable, highly predictable cash flows directly funded by taxpayers. [1, 2]

1. The Major Private Prison Corporations
A small handful of massive corporations control the vast majority of the private prison and immigration detention market in the United States. The primary beneficiaries include: [1, 2]

• CoreCivic (formerly known as Corrections Corporation of America / CCA Headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee, CoreCivic is one of the largest private prison operators in the country. They historically pioneered the push for long-term state contracts with 90% bed guarantees. [1, 2, 3]
• The GEO Group: Based in Boca Raton, Florida, this is the other dominant player in the industry. Alongside CoreCivic, The GEO Group generates billions of dollars in annual revenue by utilizing minimum occupancy clauses to insulate their business from fluctuations in state and federal crime rates. [1, 2]
• Management and Training Corporation (MTC): A large, privately held corporation that operates numerous correctional and detention facilities across several states, enforcing similar contractual quotas to maintain profitability. [1, 2]

2. Shareholders and Wall Street Investors
Both CoreCivic and The GEO Group are publicly traded companies. Their financial structures draw heavy investment from major institutional investors, mutual funds, and hedge funds. Minimum occupancy clauses essentially function as a government-backed revenue guarantee, making these companies highly attractive to Wall Street investors looking for low-risk, high-yield stock performance. [1, 2, 3]

3. Corporate Executives
Because these corporations are heavily profitable, their top executives benefit from multi-million dollar compensation packages tied to corporate financial performance. For example, executive salaries and stock options are directly bolstered by the "low-crime taxes" paid out by state governments when actual prison populations drop. [1, 2]

4. Secondary Supply Vendors
The financial benefits of guaranteed occupancy also trickle down to a sprawling secondary market of private subcontractors. These include:

• Private healthcare providers contracted to service the facilities.
• Corporate food service and commissary vendors.
• Inmate telecom companies that charge high rates for phone calls and video visitations.

By locking states into high inmate counts, these secondary entities enjoy a guaranteed, captive customer base. [1]

If you'd like to explore further, I can provide information on:

• How much lobbying money these companies spend to influence sentencing laws
• The specific financial impact on states like Arizona or Colorado that paid millions for empty beds
• How federal immigration detention (ICE) contracts utilize similar per-day, per-bed structures

 

[Findthetone1]

.....cont

The private entities that benefit most from these minimum occupancy clauses are for-profit prison corporations, their executive leadership, and their Wall Street shareholders.

Because these companies operate on a business model where more inmates equal more revenue, lockup quotas guarantee stable, highly predictable cash flows directly funded by taxpayers. [1, 2]

1. The Major Private Prison Corporations
A small handful of massive corporations control the vast majority of the private prison and immigration detention market in the United States. The primary beneficiaries include: [1, 2]

• CoreCivic (formerly known as Corrections Corporation of America / CCA Headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee, CoreCivic is one of the largest private prison operators in the country. They historically pioneered the push for long-term state contracts with 90% bed guarantees. [1, 2, 3]
• The GEO Group: Based in Boca Raton, Florida, this is the other dominant player in the industry. Alongside CoreCivic, The GEO Group generates billions of dollars in annual revenue by utilizing minimum occupancy clauses to insulate their business from fluctuations in state and federal crime rates. [1, 2]
• Management and Training Corporation (MTC): A large, privately held corporation that operates numerous correctional and detention facilities across several states, enforcing similar contractual quotas to maintain profitability. [1, 2]

2. Shareholders and Wall Street Investors
Both CoreCivic and The GEO Group are publicly traded companies. Their financial structures draw heavy investment from major institutional investors, mutual funds, and hedge funds. Minimum occupancy clauses essentially function as a government-backed revenue guarantee, making these companies highly attractive to Wall Street investors looking for low-risk, high-yield stock performance. [1, 2, 3]

3. Corporate Executives
Because these corporations are heavily profitable, their top executives benefit from multi-million dollar compensation packages tied to corporate financial performance. For example, executive salaries and stock options are directly bolstered by the "low-crime taxes" paid out by state governments when actual prison populations drop. [1, 2]

4. Secondary Supply Vendors
The financial benefits of guaranteed occupancy also trickle down to a sprawling secondary market of private subcontractors. These include:

• Private healthcare providers contracted to service the facilities.
• Corporate food service and commissary vendors.
• Inmate telecom companies that charge high rates for phone calls and video visitations.

By locking states into high inmate counts, these secondary entities enjoy a guaranteed, captive customer base. [1]

If you'd like to explore further, I can provide information on:

• How much lobbying money these companies spend to influence sentencing laws
• The specific financial impact on states like Arizona or Colorado that paid millions for empty beds
• How federal immigration detention (ICE) contracts utilize similar per-day, per-bed structures

Don't really like an AI response as it shows no effort but appreciate the information nonetheless.
So, if all prisons were all government run, would there not be constant and nonstop bitching from panty wastes (Canadians) about " MY TAX MONEY!!!!"?
And as @lol stated, maybe not break the law?

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

The fact that you even think that bugs me shows just how fucking stupid you are.

You go out of your way to attempt to insult us in nearly every post. That means you have a wound that won't heal. I'm glad one of us gave it to you.

Now, if you'd only either bleed out or heal we wouldn't have to witness your tears of anger over and over and over again.

 

[VonBonfire]

So, if all prisons were all government run, would there not be constant and nonstop bitching from panty wastes (Canadians) about " MY TAX MONEY!!!!"?

We are paying taxes for it regardless, only now there is a vested interest in keeping prisons full of people. State run prisons have had their issues too which is why I suggested bolstering the middle class as the best solution. In previous times where we had a stronger middle class we had fewer people doing time.

 

[lol]

Don't really like an AI response as it shows no effort but appreciate the information nonetheless.
So, if all prisons were all government run, would there not be constant and nonstop bitching from panty wastes (Canadians) about " MY TAX MONEY!!!!"?
And as @lol stated, maybe not break the law?

Yep. If profiling and quotas are a thing, I say hit them where it hurts. Don't break the law so they begin to realize profiling is useless and they do not meet their quotas.

Too much to ask for though since people have been complaining about profiling and for profit prisons for ages yet consistently prove they were profiled for good reason and can't help but assist said for profit prisons in meeting their quotas lol.

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

Yep. If profiling and quotas are a thing, I say hit them where it hurts. Don't break the law so they begin to realize profiling is useless and they do not meet their quotas.

Too much to ask for though since people have been complaining about profiling and for profit prisons for ages yet consistently prove they were profiled for good reason and can't help but assist said for profit prisons in meeting their quotas lol.

You don't need to be breaking the law to get pulled over and hassled until they can find a reason to arrest you.

If you think only guilty people get arrested....well, in short, you're VERY mistaken.

 

[Findthetone1]

You go out of your way to attempt to insult us in nearly every post. That means you have a wound that won't heal. I'm glad one of us gave it to you.

Now, if you'd only either bleed out or heal we wouldn't have to witness your tears of anger over and over and over again.

Faggot says what?

 

[lol]

You don't need to be breaking the law to get pulled over and hassled until they can find a reason to arrest you.

If you think only guilty people get arrested....well, in short, you're VERY mistaken.

Right, totally innocent people are just being arrested and jailed left and right lol. It happens, but absolutely no where near the scale it is being made out to be. "This guy is totally innocent. Let me toss his ass in jail so we meet quota for half a day." Lol.

With the usage of AI by lazy ass cops, I can see an increase happening now, I'll admit that.

There should also be ramifications for the cops themselves. From what I've seen, it's the tax payer that loses at the end of the day. As I've said, I don't have a lot of love for cops. So I do my best to not ever have to deal with them. Many times I don't see them much different than gang members, especially where I live.

 

[Findthetone1]

Right, totally innocent people are just being arrested and jailed left and right lol. It happens, but absolutely no where near the scale it is being made out to be. "This guy is totally innocent. Let me toss his ass in jail so we meet quota for half a day." Lol.

Cops are under more scrutiny and demonization than ever. If it happens in modern day, it's an infinitesimal amount and the cop will get caught at some point. And should.

With the usage of AI by lazy ass cops, I can see an increase happening now, I'll admit that.

I'm curious how you think that will work

Many times I don't see them much different than gang members, especially where I live.

What did people expect when the "defund the police" shit started? The people that were qualified and able to do the job said fuck that. Why would they want to deal with it?

 

[Findthetone1]

Law and order types are always the most pissed when the profiling stuff comes for them too. I had a cop try to fight me in St. Petersburg because I refused to concede my constitutional rights on private property during a call he responded to that I had absolutely nothing to do with. Turns out this was his SOP. Check out this douchebag:

View attachment 463346

Officer Ruben DeJesus is a former longtime officer with the St. Petersburg Police Department in Florida, best known for two major high-profile incidents during his career: [1, 2]

• 2011 Fatal Shooting: On September 26, 2011, DeJesus (then 50 years old) fatally shot 18-year-old Jared Speakman at the Jungle Prada boat ramp park after a physical struggle over a handgun. An internal and state review eventually ruled the use of deadly force justified. [1, 2]
• 2016 Excessive Force Investigation & Resignation: In May 2016, surveillance and cell phone video from the Del Mar Gastro Lounge showed DeJesus (then a 31-year veteran of the force) repeatedly tasing and kicking Hillsborough County firefighter Clint Walker—who was on the ground with his hands behind his back—as well as pushing another man. DeJesus resigned and retired in October 2016 while an internal affairs investigation into the incident was underway. [1, 2, 3]

He gave conflicting stories during the Speakman incident investigation. That was a big deal when it happened. Speakman was well liked around town. Some said Speakman always carried a gun, but just having seen the way DeJesus escalated stuff with me I seriously doubt he was 100% in the right. You have to wonder how many people he pulled the same kind of crap with over the course of his 31 year career before he retired to avoid the repercussions of his actions. This is your average low IQ, fear driven, dirty cop. Unlike most, he got caught.

Is this Wiki? Okie Dokie. Anyhoo, he got caught, yes? And I guarantee there's more to the story with your encounter.
But it sounds like you and Cunt Sister #1 sure know how to do the job better. You should sign up.