Looks like rosewood, hard as maple, similar snap but more even tone everywhere without having to worry about the occasional dead spots you can get with maple.
For me, if it's a traditional style strat, it has to be maple. If it's some superstrat, anything'll be fine, but I like maple the best. It's mostly a looks thing, to be honest.
For me, if it's a traditional style strat, it has to be maple. If it's some superstrat, anything'll be fine, but I like maple the best. It's mostly a looks thing, to be honest.
I've never been able to "hear" a difference in fretboard woods like everybody else seems to.
Never really been able to hear much or any difference in body woods either. Ash/Alder. Who cares? Either a guitar is resonant and sounds good or it doesn't. I've played so many good and bad sounding Stratocasters, Telecasters, SG's and Les Pauls over the years that for me it's really a guitar by guitar basis.
Sweeping generalizations like "mahogany or basswood is such a better tonewood than ash" Are ridiculous. I've heard em all over the years.
Gotta be Rosewood for me. A nice lacquer maple neck is a work of art, but I have difficulty with the friction on the fretboard. With that said, a satin maple fretboard feels good to me too since my first Strat had one.