
Rock Bodom
Active member
Initially I think it was the lower frequencies pushing the equipment. Vai tried the 7 string route with a model that never took off within his genre, Korn came up with a clever and massively popular twist on the idea and the boom really started.311splawndude":1imirllk said:That reminds me. I've been thinking about this for awhile.
You know how music (rock, mostly metal) have gone more and more down-tuned, more bass heavy, kick drums, big bass, blast beats, all that? Like since Van Halen started dropping his E string to D or down tuning a half step? I kid. I kid. He wasn't the first.
Well my Rig-pinion is that this trend has loosely coincided with better speakers, better drivers, better amplification, better recording tools etc. Imagine trying to play Korn on an old stereo from the early 80's or even a boom box. Speakers we use today are so much better and can handle the lower frequencies better. Right? Or am I just making this up?
Was the equipment allowing for lower frequencies or were the lower frequencies pushing equipment to get better?
Over time, everything has gotten more bass centric, not just metal though that's where you get more of the de-tuning as well. Pop, rap/hip-hop, electronic...more bass than ever. So I think to that extent de-tuned metal has been able to take advantage of the tech and that kind of helps perpetuate it as well.
Though back to the "unpopular opinions" theme...I don't think a lot of the gear trends are necessarily "better" today, but rather far more efficient. Honestly, most modern amps don't wow me, and many recordings to me sound way too sterile with bad eq. But the trade-off being astronomically easier than ever to get stuff recorded/collaborate, or carry much less gear to perform and still get pretty decent tones and much better reliability.
And hey, it wasn't Korn level low, but we listened to those old "de-tuned" Sabbath albums on those old stereos just fine!

