our freedom of choice is 40 flavors of hamburger helper, 31 flavors of ice cream, 20 different varieties of Rice-O-Roni, 10 different mass produced piss beer options, 400 energy drinks, 200 Negative energy drinks (those canned cocktails that make light weights act a fool and bring about negative energy) 2 different political parties both controlled by corporate interests, one just uses humanitarianism as a crutch, the other uses the opposite as a crutch.
everything from the fictional sociopath in your avatar, to your chosen screen name, to your comment, is all perfectly on brand, cliche, G.O.P.
Sadly it's not bro'.If this thread is still about Peavey...
Stop judging my gear choices, you meanie!Its wild some peeps with $15k-20k worth of gear complain about prices. Yet still buy more gear.
lol... You should probably watch the movie
What is it about music forums and senile guys trying to recruit for the democrats. Is there a single place to hide from this?
Conflict of interest ? You sure conflict of interest is the right term ?There be some weird-ass shit FoSho
There's a case waiting for outcome at SCOTUS brought by the Vice Pres Vance [talk about conflict of interest] to allow un-limited campaign money directly to the Presidential candidates themselves dark money, any money with no guardrails or limitations or disclosures w/a click of a mouse elections will be bought by money & not chosen by voters.
John Roberts thinks he's a "corporate lawyer" now. Once he passes that just like he did unlimted campaign contributions a decade or so ago we just became MOTHER RUSSIA.
And guess who you can thank for all that ?
![]()
Yeah the political arguments broke the camel's back; had it not been for them the thread would still be in the main sub-forum.I'm not surprised Dan had to bring his bullshit out to the main forum...
Yeah the political arguments broke the camel's back; had it not been for them the thread would still be in the main sub-forum.
Peeps have to learn at some point to ask themselves before posting, "Is this in the main forum or OTC?".
I know; it's rocket science.
That was my first bass amp too. It actually sounded great with my old Les Paul Recording bass.first amp = tko 80 solid state bass amp. hit with my hohner strat and ross distortion.
I still have one. I had it to my tech for some repairs a few years back when my old man could still play. It was his favorite amp.That was my first bass amp too. It actually sounded great with my old Les Paul Recording bass.
It's a function of an economic system rooted in interest bearing debt. Because there's always more debt than money in the system, everything has to keep growing faster than the interest rate or it all falls apart. We need to come up with a new system, because we have surpassed the Earth's carrying capacity and at the current rate of growth, we will need all the energy in the entire galaxy within about 400 years.To me it seems odd that the current economic system relies on growth. It's not sufficient to just be successful (making a healthy profit); a company has to be more successful than it was before. Otherwise the investment doesn't return enough; the 401Ks won't grow and retirement saving will collapse etc. (401Ks can't stay flat given inflation). Seems like a bad system.
But companies like Peavey I think get stuck. They have to sell out to cheaper manufacturing to try to be ever more profitable or are vulnerable to a take over if they "merely" stay successful.
Hyperbole much bro'?... because we have surpassed the Earth's carrying capacity and at the current rate of growth, we will need all the energy in the entire galaxy within about 400 years.
It's a function of an economic system rooted in interest bearing debt. Because there's always more debt than money in the system, everything has to keep growing faster than the interest rate or it all falls apart. We need to come up with a new system, because we have surpassed the Earth's carrying capacity and at the current rate of growth, we will need all the energy in the entire galaxy within about 400 years.
Most scientific indicators suggest humanity is over Earth's carrying capacity, using resources faster than they can regenerate, with the Global Footprint Network estimating we need 1.7 Earths to sustain current consumption, though the exact number is debated due to technology, lifestyle, and resource use variations. We've been in "ecological overshoot" since the 1970s, meaning our demand exceeds the planet's biocapacity.Eh how how? Carrying capacity as in population?
We are on the cliff of a global demographic collapse due to lack of children being born outside of subsaharan africa (where the majority of all human children will be born by the end of the century)
People worry about AI taking their jobs but unless the expectation was for subsaharan africa (who can't stop killing each other long enough to support themselves) to support the entire world economy, it probably arrived just in time.
If we don't see a radical birth rate reversal across Asia/Europe/America then you're just going to see colossal wealth consolidation among the few people in developed nations still having children but no growth in production because of lack of modern consumers.