
Digital Jams
New member
Oh I would buy me a Billy Bogner solo disk 

tekbow":3rzydpnw said:i was reading over this and there was a lot of wailing on EVH, now, yes i agree he's in a bad way now and just seems to be taking care of his own van halen covers band but...
and hear me out..
Something was niggling me over the criticism he was getting..
now i think this albums been deleted (they hated it so much) but if i remember rightly, in fact i dont need to because i listened to it today, when he did van halen III he did try to shake things up a little and do something different and a little experimental.
I'm not defending this album, or gary cherone wanting to be freddy mercury in it, and i'm not saying every track was solid gold, because it was far from that. but there were a few standout moments on there when i thought he was really trying and succeeding. he's was taking a different direction and playing with his sound and chops and it was really good.
"without you" is note worthy, as is "josephina". and i even quite liked "how many say I". the album may not have worked, but it wasn't stale.
and what happened? they got hammered for it, people wanted them to stick to what they'd always done, and now we're kind of bitching because they won't push things anymore..
bigdaddyd":2g8gj3n4 said:tekbow":2g8gj3n4 said:i was reading over this and there was a lot of wailing on EVH, now, yes i agree he's in a bad way now and just seems to be taking care of his own van halen covers band but...
and hear me out..
Something was niggling me over the criticism he was getting..
now i think this albums been deleted (they hated it so much) but if i remember rightly, in fact i dont need to because i listened to it today, when he did van halen III he did try to shake things up a little and do something different and a little experimental.
I'm not defending this album, or gary cherone wanting to be freddy mercury in it, and i'm not saying every track was solid gold, because it was far from that. but there were a few standout moments on there when i thought he was really trying and succeeding. he's was taking a different direction and playing with his sound and chops and it was really good.
"without you" is note worthy, as is "josephina". and i even quite liked "how many say I". the album may not have worked, but it wasn't stale.
and what happened? they got hammered for it, people wanted them to stick to what they'd always done, and now we're kind of bitching because they won't push things anymore..
No offense, but as a hardcore VH and Extreme fan my take on VH III is this. EVH was done and had been listening to Extreme and Nuno. Without You is a ridiculous attempt at Cupid's Dead. Cue them up at the same time and you can see it. It is subtle, but only because Without You is just that bad. Granted Nuno started as an EVH clone, but them far surpassed him. It was no accident that EVH snagged Gary. As for Gary trying to be Freddy, that is nuts. The only person Gary was trying to be on VH III was SAMMY...and that was all EVH's doing. You can tell Gary wasn't singing like himself. Any Extreme fan will tell you that, and Gary IS a Freddy fan. When he sings like himself, he does sing like Freddy. That album failed BECAUSE of EVH and no one putting him in check.
tekbow":10tkqxgg said:bigdaddyd":10tkqxgg said:tekbow":10tkqxgg said:i was reading over this and there was a lot of wailing on EVH, now, yes i agree he's in a bad way now and just seems to be taking care of his own van halen covers band but...
and hear me out..
Something was niggling me over the criticism he was getting..
now i think this albums been deleted (they hated it so much) but if i remember rightly, in fact i dont need to because i listened to it today, when he did van halen III he did try to shake things up a little and do something different and a little experimental.
I'm not defending this album, or gary cherone wanting to be freddy mercury in it, and i'm not saying every track was solid gold, because it was far from that. but there were a few standout moments on there when i thought he was really trying and succeeding. he's was taking a different direction and playing with his sound and chops and it was really good.
"without you" is note worthy, as is "josephina". and i even quite liked "how many say I". the album may not have worked, but it wasn't stale.
and what happened? they got hammered for it, people wanted them to stick to what they'd always done, and now we're kind of bitching because they won't push things anymore..
No offense, but as a hardcore VH and Extreme fan my take on VH III is this. EVH was done and had been listening to Extreme and Nuno. Without You is a ridiculous attempt at Cupid's Dead. Cue them up at the same time and you can see it. It is subtle, but only because Without You is just that bad. Granted Nuno started as an EVH clone, but them far surpassed him. It was no accident that EVH snagged Gary. As for Gary trying to be Freddy, that is nuts. The only person Gary was trying to be on VH III was SAMMY...and that was all EVH's doing. You can tell Gary wasn't singing like himself. Any Extreme fan will tell you that, and Gary IS a Freddy fan. When he sings like himself, he does sing like Freddy. That album failed BECAUSE of EVH and no one putting him in check.
also a fan of both for many years, and yeah, without you's rythym chops were nunoesque, and i agree nuno now is a much fresher sounding guitarist after his years in the business. i disagree without you was awful, not so keen on gary's singing in it, but i thought there was nice work in that one. the freddy comment was glib, but as you say you're self the guy sounds like freddy and i wonder if it wasn't more to do with Gary singing up to that VH sound thaan eddie pushing him.
the last comment there sums it up, one man's flight of ego is another man's attempt to do something different. and your viewpoint is just as valid as mine, but i do stand by my position of, he tried to do something experimental and different and got wailed on because he didn't ssound like he always did, and now we're wailing on him because he sounds exactly like he always did like he's got lazy.
bigdaddyd":2dmmsiko said:I am not discrediting your viewpoint.
RedRider":1dphnsru said:You also have to take into account the fact that some of the guys that have fallen off so much are the ones who have been put through the freekin RINGER by the music industry. The bigger they were, the more crap they had to put up with, and the love of music is that much further away as the industry demands are what comes to the forefront. THe guys that only have mild success arent bent by the industry even SLIGHTLY as much as the big names. Do you really think that paul gilbert, Steve Vai, all the guys who are still emotionally invested are being yanked left and right even 5% as much as EVH?? How many years has EVH spent with the industry churning and burning just trying to squeeze everything they can out of him??
Think about your own job....if you had your boss and the entire company you work for on your ass 25 hours a day how much would you love your job....I can TOTALLY understand why Eddie completely burnt himself out...and at this point is somewhat going through the motions...as EVERYTHING he does will have industry spin on it...
My opinion is, regardless of whether he released it at the peak of his abilities or not, an EVH solo record would have sucked balls. Eddie writes music for people to sing over - that is what he's great at. Also, Eddie needs a foil like DLR to be at his best. That is where the magic is. When left to his own devices, or working with cheeseball singers, his material sucks balls. One of the smartest things he ever did was not releasing a solo instrumental album even though we were all clamoring for it. The only success would have been financial...mentoneman":1ugu95m4 said:if vh would have put out a solo record of his fabled practice cassette tapes at the height of his popularity and skill, he would have sold a trillion of those. he'd probably still make a fortune releasing something like that on itunes, and it would represent his peak years as a player and would remind the fans what VH was all about.
Echodrive":2th3muks said:Many have postulated that Joe Perry didn't play the leads on "Train Kept' A Rollin". Well, he did!
So - you may be right. The fact remains that Joe was nailing those licks in 75, and there's video to prove it.sah5150":2fbpm2bg said:Echodrive":2fbpm2bg said:Many have postulated that Joe Perry didn't play the leads on "Train Kept' A Rollin". Well, he did!![]()
Joe Perry did not play those leads. They were played by Steve Hunter and Dick Wagner. They also played the leads on "Same Old Song and Dance". If you can't hear their unique playing on those solos and think Perry played 'em, you're deaf...
Steve
sah5150":yb67y5dh said:My opinion is, regardless of whether he released it at the peak of his abilities or not, an EVH solo record would have sucked balls. Eddie writes music for people to sing over - that is what he's great at. Also, Eddie needs a foil like DLR to be at his best. That is where the magic is. When left to his own devices, or working with cheeseball singers, his material sucks balls. One of the smartest things he ever did was not releasing a solo instrumental album even though we were all clamoring for it. The only success would have been financial...mentoneman":yb67y5dh said:if vh would have put out a solo record of his fabled practice cassette tapes at the height of his popularity and skill, he would have sold a trillion of those. he'd probably still make a fortune releasing something like that on itunes, and it would represent his peak years as a player and would remind the fans what VH was all about.
Steve
I'm sure he was forced to learn it - the stuff was burning - Hunter and Wagner are great players. Can you point me to the videos of him playing the "Train Kept A'Rollin"" solo accurately live in '75? I'm not doubting, would just like to hear it because I saw Aerosmith back then and I don't recall him playing it like that, although, I will admit he was able to cop that solo more closely later in his career.. In the mid-late '70s, I remember myself and a lot of my friends being bummed at Aerosmith's live performances because they played stuff so differently from the records...Echodrive":1u9xpeh5 said:So - you may be right. The fact remains that Joe was nailing those licks in 75, and there's video to prove it.
Welll... I dunno... I find Steve Hunter and Dick Wagner's playing to be VERY recognizable and unique - if you listen to the Lou Reed Live album, the Alice Cooper stuff they played on, I can pick there playing out immediately. I'd say it's unique if I can recognize a players voice...Echodrive":1u9xpeh5 said:While there is some great lead playing there - I wouldn't describe it as "unique" at all.
No argument there...Echodrive":1u9xpeh5 said:I refer you to UFO's "Obsession" album... That's unique!
I hate that song, and as a, 80s misfit, I don't remember anyone in Hollywood trying to cop "Home Tonight" lead work or sound. Most of the dudes I know were trying to sound/play like EVH and look like Heather Locklear...Echodrive":1u9xpeh5 said:If there's any Aerosmith lead breaks that I'd describe as "unique", it would be the lead work on "Home Tonight". You know the the tune... Most of the pointy-top Charvel players out of LA were copying (attempting to copy) the "Aerosmith sound" in the 1980's... You remember!![]()
![]()
mentoneman":1co3g037 said:i wouldn't mind seeing uli on fire.Greazygeo":1co3g037 said:The last few Uli cd's are amazing. I caught him twice the last time he toured....the show in Pittsburgh was unreal, totally on fire! The band was killer as well. Under a Dark Sky has some great stuff on it, Metamorphosis is mind blowing.
I think that many guys end up working on songwriting instead of working on scales for hours on end.
Lynch seems like the player that when he works things out comes up with cool stuff. Probably in the mindset of just go for it and see what happens....sometimes you fall on your face, other times land on your feet. If you like his old playing there are always cd's to listen.![]()
all i remember seeing recently is weird hippy stuff with the 30 fret guitar playing sky church yoga music or an awkward jam with the scorpions. but ant too said uli still has it so i'm sure he can still bust some sails of charon without wetting his pants.
70strathead":1s01u2lt said:mentoneman":1s01u2lt said:i wouldn't mind seeing uli on fire.Greazygeo":1s01u2lt said:The last few Uli cd's are amazing. I caught him twice the last time he toured....the show in Pittsburgh was unreal, totally on fire! The band was killer as well. Under a Dark Sky has some great stuff on it, Metamorphosis is mind blowing.
I think that many guys end up working on songwriting instead of working on scales for hours on end.
Lynch seems like the player that when he works things out comes up with cool stuff. Probably in the mindset of just go for it and see what happens....sometimes you fall on your face, other times land on your feet. If you like his old playing there are always cd's to listen.![]()
all i remember seeing recently is weird hippy stuff with the 30 fret guitar playing sky church yoga music or an awkward jam with the scorpions. but ant too said uli still has it so i'm sure he can still bust some sails of charon without wetting his pants.
Fun post Pat and dug your Lane improv clip! I wouldn't really put Uli in the 80's catagory for starters, he was playing Brahms and Beethoven lines weaved in with tasty blues back in the 70's. But I have an interesting perspective on the topic because I got to see Warren D ( probably my fav 80's rock guitarist) do an improv jam with uli on All along the watchtower and it was like the protege following the mentor. After about 4 minutes of trading off solos warren was repeating licks while Uli was telling stories and ceating paeks and valleys, melodies harmonies and didnt repeat one note..the longer the jam went the more expressive Uli got and Warren just stepped back and shook his head. Uli hasnt lost it, but I wish he would go back to playing a strat because im not a fam of tha shy guitar tone. Also, as Greazyeo said, his last two releases are nothing less than brilliant composition and performance wise.
Joe Perry claims he played a lap-steel guitar on HT. I absolutely love the lead tone he's (someone's) getting... No effects - just guitar and one very loud amp! I really thought that Motley Crue's "Home Sweet Home" was inspired by "Home Tonight". I won't even go into Ratt's "OOTC" release - but I do love me some "Wanted Man" action!sah5150":u7d0vndq said:I'm sure he was forced to learn it - the stuff was burning - Hunter and Wagner are great players. Can you point me to the videos of him playing the "Train Kept A'Rollin"" solo accurately live in '75? I'm not doubting, would just like to hear it because I saw Aerosmith back then and I don't recall him playing it like that, although, I will admit he was able to cop that solo more closely later in his career.. In the mid-late '70s, I remember myself and a lot of my friends being bummed at Aerosmith's live performances because they played stuff so differently from the records...Echodrive":u7d0vndq said:So - you may be right. The fact remains that Joe was nailing those licks in 75, and there's video to prove it.
Welll... I dunno... I find Steve Hunter and Dick Wagner's playing to be VERY recognizable and unique - if you listen to the Lou Reed Live album, the Alice Cooper stuff they played on, I can pick there playing out immediately. I'd say it's unique if I can recognize a players voice...Echodrive":u7d0vndq said:While there is some great lead playing there - I wouldn't describe it as "unique" at all.
No argument there...Echodrive":u7d0vndq said:I refer you to UFO's "Obsession" album... That's unique!
I hate that song, and as a, 80s misfit, I don't remember anyone in Hollywood trying to cop "Home Tonight" lead work or sound. Most of the dudes I know were trying to sound/play like EVH and look like Heather Locklear...Echodrive":u7d0vndq said:If there's any Aerosmith lead breaks that I'd describe as "unique", it would be the lead work on "Home Tonight". You know the the tune... Most of the pointy-top Charvel players out of LA were copying (attempting to copy) the "Aerosmith sound" in the 1980's... You remember!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Steve
sah5150":my1rwbu6 said:My opinion is, regardless of whether he released it at the peak of his abilities or not, an EVH solo record would have sucked balls. Eddie writes music for people to sing over - that is what he's great at. Also, Eddie needs a foil like DLR to be at his best. That is where the magic is. When left to his own devices, or working with cheeseball singers, his material sucks balls. One of the smartest things he ever did was not releasing a solo instrumental album even though we were all clamoring for it. The only success would have been financial...mentoneman":my1rwbu6 said:if vh would have put out a solo record of his fabled practice cassette tapes at the height of his popularity and skill, he would have sold a trillion of those. he'd probably still make a fortune releasing something like that on itunes, and it would represent his peak years as a player and would remind the fans what VH was all about.
Steve
interesting post.Echodrive":7e9a4sv7 said:Many players (back in the 60's, 70's, and 80's) would spend much of their time practicing and performing "under the influence". What happens is you develop a a sense of what is referred to as "state dependent learning". You do best that which you learned in the same frame of mind. I'm sure many of you have said in jest; "He sounded better when he was doing the drugs..." For some players this is definitely the case.
C: