Relics are for Posers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rupe
  • Start date Start date
rupe":12q54865 said:
It was meant as nothing more than a point of discussion on a completely subjective topic. We come here to share opinions and the article was an op-ed. How is this any different than talking about musical tastes and amp/effect preferences?
:rock:

Isn't a sharing of opinions exactly what we are doing in this thread? What were you looking for, 73 people to say "I agree rupe"? That would be a kick ass thread. :scared:

And calling someone a poseur because they have a differing opinion on a "completely subjective topic" is certainly a way to piss people off. I don't like being called a poseur. I never did even when I had an 80's Hollywood look and the guys in heavy bands would call me a pussy or a fag or a poseur. A poseur wouldn't have been able to rip many or most of them a new ass on guitar. A "fag" wouldn't have spent so much time chasing girls in his bands crowd. A crowd that actually contained lots of females.

I understand completely someone not digging a relic look. Personally, I am bored by guitars that look like they just came off the shelf. But if some guy with a brand new, never a fingerprint on it, guitar comes out and HE kicks ass on that guitar, I would be an idiot to dismiss him as a guitar polishing, concours de elegance loving, cookie cutter guitar, case queen player. I judge a guitarist on how he plays guitar, not what kind of guitar he plays. When people start judging a player on his taste in guitar finishes and throwing out the word poseur, I think that shows a mentality that is begging for a verbal bitch slap. I made an attempt at it.
 
^^^^^ That's right, whether you play a Charvel or a... tele.... it's all about what you play.... ;)
 
Cunt, Pussy, Vagina, Bitch Slap - Damn this thread delivers.

I could care less either way what anybody else plays. I agree with the ones stating a poseur is somebody that cannot play acting the part anyway.
 
I prefer posing because it distracts the focus from the real me, which is really boring.
 
yawn.jpg


:D
 
Every Les Paul refin my bud, Dave Johnson, has done for pros has gone out the door with some level of relicing...and these guys are definitely not posers.
 
Chubtone":190pcftv said:
rupe":190pcftv said:
It was meant as nothing more than a point of discussion on a completely subjective topic. We come here to share opinions and the article was an op-ed. How is this any different than talking about musical tastes and amp/effect preferences?
:rock:

Isn't a sharing of opinions exactly what we are doing in this thread? What were you looking for, 73 people to say "I agree rupe"? That would be a kick ass thread. :scared:

And calling someone a poseur because they have a differing opinion on a "completely subjective topic" is certainly a way to piss people off. I don't like being called a poseur. I never did even when I had an 80's Hollywood look and the guys in heavy bands would call me a pussy or a fag or a poseur. A poseur wouldn't have been able to rip many or most of them a new ass on guitar. A "fag" wouldn't have spent so much time chasing girls in his bands crowd. A crowd that actually contained lots of females.

I understand completely someone not digging a relic look. Personally, I am bored by guitars that look like they just came off the shelf. But if some guy with a brand new, never a fingerprint on it, guitar comes out and HE kicks ass on that guitar, I would be an idiot to dismiss him as a guitar polishing, concours de elegance loving, cookie cutter guitar, case queen player. I judge a guitarist on how he plays guitar, not what kind of guitar he plays. When people start judging a player on his taste in guitar finishes and throwing out the word poseur, I think that shows a mentality that is begging for a verbal bitch slap. I made an attempt at it.

Wow...you're reading far more into this than I ever meant to invoke. Chill :poke: ;) The opinion part is cool...the bashing of other's opinions and the "who cares?" comments are what I'm referring to. And I never called anybody a poser...in fact I asked a question as opposed to making a statement to try and keep it respectful and conversational. Obviously its somewhat of a divisive subject...thought it could be fun to bash around a bit, until the itchy pussy crew showed up.

And I don't even mind the look when it's either earned or done well. My "issue" is with a certain faction (you've seen them being in music retail) that tries to buy credibility rather than earn it...the right hair, clothes, boots, etc and the hippest gear but can't play anything outside of barre chords and the minor pentatonic box.

And if everybody agreed with me, it would be a kick-ass thread! :yes: :D
 
rupe":1p3eolxa said:
My "issue" is with a certain faction (you've seen them being in music retail) that tries to buy credibility rather than earn it...the right hair, clothes, boots, etc and the hippest gear but can't play anything outside of barre chords and the minor pentatonic box.

Let them try to spend their way to credibility. It keeps the economy churning. In the meantime, they're facade will be revealed as soon as they plug in their guitar. You can't buy musical credibility. Many have tried and failed miserably.

Don't sweat it; forget it. ;)
 
Shiny_Surface":37rdharl said:
This..poseurs back in the 80's were the guys who had the full Marshall stack, 2 or 3 nice guitars, long hair and the outfits..but couldn't play for shit. But they got into bands because they looked the part, even though they could barely play bar chords.

Growing up in the 80's this was exactly what I was thinking when I read Steve's post.

Some of you guys are going to DefCon 4 just because people don't like something you do.

Funny how some love typing their opinions but when they read something they don't agree with they turn around and say you shouldn't have any opinion interesting double standard. :lol: :LOL:

All I'm saying is, we all have opinions, it's just amazing that people can get so bent out of shape in either direction. Clear enough?
 
rupe":aq70e2w2 said:
My "issue" is with a certain faction (you've seen them being in music retail) that tries to buy credibility rather than earn it...the right hair, clothes, boots, etc and the hippest gear but can't play anything outside of barre chords and the minor pentatonic box.

But I have to ask... Who cares. You can't buy MUSICAL credibility with hair, clothes, boots and gear. The only thing you get is the credibility of being a trendy collector. You'll be exposed as soon as you post your first clip (if you dare). And I'll add that if you just dig looking like a rocker and owning the coolest gear, even though you can barely play, i see nothing wrong with that. Do whatever makes you happy. Life is difficult and if you are more pleasant when I encounter you because you spent the evening looking at all your cool gear, all the better. Everybody wins. Yay!!!

Steve
 
Bob Savage":10yjgyyw said:
JimmyBlind":10yjgyyw said:
I just think that the act of deliberately damaging a perfectly good guitar with the aim of deluding people into thinking that it has seen the world, or that the player is some sort of off-the-rails Pete Townsend & doesn't need a pristine musical instrument to sound good, is contrived, deceitful & pretentious.

I certainly wouldn't pay a professional to do it for me. But hey. To each his own I guess.

If you want to go there then you should consider that in many/most musical genres the entire act of the performance is contrived, deceitful and pretentious.

Great Point! :thumbsup:
 
sah5150":1zdkl4cj said:
rupe":1zdkl4cj said:
My "issue" is with a certain faction (you've seen them being in music retail) that tries to buy credibility rather than earn it...the right hair, clothes, boots, etc and the hippest gear but can't play anything outside of barre chords and the minor pentatonic box.

But I have to ask... Who cares. You can't buy MUSICAL credibility with hair, clothes, boots and gear. The only thing you get is the credibility of being a trendy collector. You'll be exposed as soon as you post your first clip (if you dare). And I'll add that if you just dig looking like a rocker and owning the coolest gear, even though you can barely play, i see nothing wrong with that. Do whatever makes you happy. Life is difficult and if you are more pleasant when I encounter you because you spent the evening looking at all your cool gear, all the better. Everybody wins. Yay!!!

Steve
Nobody should have any true deep-seeded caring about any of this shit...it's merely a topic of light conversation. Did a bunch of you wake up today with a big bowl full of analytical flakes? It's a simple matter of tastes and opinions.

As for "who cares?", why even bother posting then? If something doesn't interest someone, wouldn't they be better served by ignoring it rather than addressing it in a condescending manner?
 
rupe":phjx8f42 said:
sah5150":phjx8f42 said:
rupe":phjx8f42 said:
My "issue" is with a certain faction (you've seen them being in music retail) that tries to buy credibility rather than earn it...the right hair, clothes, boots, etc and the hippest gear but can't play anything outside of barre chords and the minor pentatonic box.

But I have to ask... Who cares. You can't buy MUSICAL credibility with hair, clothes, boots and gear. The only thing you get is the credibility of being a trendy collector. You'll be exposed as soon as you post your first clip (if you dare). And I'll add that if you just dig looking like a rocker and owning the coolest gear, even though you can barely play, i see nothing wrong with that. Do whatever makes you happy. Life is difficult and if you are more pleasant when I encounter you because you spent the evening looking at all your cool gear, all the better. Everybody wins. Yay!!!

Steve
Nobody should have any true deep-seeded caring about any of this shit...it's merely a topic of light conversation. Did a bunch of you wake up today with a big bowl full of analytical flakes? It's a simple matter of tastes and opinions.

As for "who cares?", why even bother posting then? If something doesn't interest someone, wouldn't they be better served by ignoring it rather than addressing it in a condescending manner?
First of all, my response was not condescending in the least, so I have no idea what you mean there. Second, I'm genuinely interested. Why do YOU care about people who can't play but dress the part and buy expensive relic'd gear that they didn't "earn"? What credibility do they get as musicians by doing it that you say you have a problem with? I'm interested in why you care...

Steve
 
rupe":3qkp7mmi said:
As for "who cares?", why even bother posting then? If something doesn't interest someone, wouldn't they be better served by ignoring it rather than addressing it in a condescending manner?
I care!!!!
 
You're all stressing out too much over this. Have a glass of orange juice and look at my avatar instead.
 
All I'm saying is, we all have opinions, it's just amazing that people can get so bent out of shape in either direction. Clear enough?

I just spun off from your comment, actually agreed with you. Words don't translate well enough sometimes. :lol: :LOL:
 
Stealthtastic":2a9dnh88 said:
You're all stressing out too much over this. Have a glass of orange juice and look at my avatar instead.
Or you can get a cheap chuckle out of this comparison of Miley Cryrus and Hank Hill.
:hys: :hys:
 
sah5150":eyx3g3vu said:
You can't buy MUSICAL credibility with hair, clothes, boots and gear.

Great, now I have to find chubtone's "why didn't you make it" thread to revise my answer.
 
Shiny_Surface":1tsbhz5x said:
All I'm saying is, we all have opinions, it's just amazing that people can get so bent out of shape in either direction. Clear enough?

I just spun off from your comment, actually agreed with you. Words don't translate well enough sometimes. :lol: :LOL:

Oh, gotcha. :D

If you read the original article, it is kinda funny how the takamine guitar the guy is bitching about looks so old. It would be like someone playing a Parker Fly with relic wear :D
 
sah5150":3vdnszk4 said:
rupe":3vdnszk4 said:
sah5150":3vdnszk4 said:
rupe":3vdnszk4 said:
My "issue" is with a certain faction (you've seen them being in music retail) that tries to buy credibility rather than earn it...the right hair, clothes, boots, etc and the hippest gear but can't play anything outside of barre chords and the minor pentatonic box.

But I have to ask... Who cares. You can't buy MUSICAL credibility with hair, clothes, boots and gear. The only thing you get is the credibility of being a trendy collector. You'll be exposed as soon as you post your first clip (if you dare). And I'll add that if you just dig looking like a rocker and owning the coolest gear, even though you can barely play, i see nothing wrong with that. Do whatever makes you happy. Life is difficult and if you are more pleasant when I encounter you because you spent the evening looking at all your cool gear, all the better. Everybody wins. Yay!!!

Steve
Nobody should have any true deep-seeded caring about any of this shit...it's merely a topic of light conversation. Did a bunch of you wake up today with a big bowl full of analytical flakes? It's a simple matter of tastes and opinions.

As for "who cares?", why even bother posting then? If something doesn't interest someone, wouldn't they be better served by ignoring it rather than addressing it in a condescending manner?
First of all, my response was not condescending in the least, so I have no idea what you mean there. Second, I'm genuinely interested. Why do YOU care about people who can't play but dress the part and buy expensive relic'd gear that they didn't "earn"? What credibility do they get as musicians by doing it that you say you have a problem with? I'm interested in why you care...

Steve
If you can't understand what's condescending about telling someone "who cares?" in response to something they've said, I don't think anything else I could say would help you figure it out. I mean seriously, you're not a dummy...you don't see it? And that's not to say how you actually meant it...I don't believe you said it to be mean-spirited.

Beyond that, I don't truly care about any of this to any great degree...once again it was simply a topic of conversation. I'm not sure how most people operate on an internet forum, but I don't take time to think through everything that I might post and decide if its worthy of discussion and/or analysis. Are there certain traits that some people have that you find annoying? That's where I was coming from...nothing more...I never intended to dive too deep with this one.
 
Back
Top