shar-vell Dan
Well-known member
2005 & after 2K DSL's they fixed the boards. Look for those years.I'd go for an older JCM2000 DSL, but I've been scared away by all the QC horror stories about the new ones.
2005 & after 2K DSL's they fixed the boards. Look for those years.I'd go for an older JCM2000 DSL, but I've been scared away by all the QC horror stories about the new ones.
If you look up user reviews on the newest DSL amps on GC there’s a lot of reports of the amps dying in a month or two, sometimes multiple amps with the same owner after they exchange them.2005 & after 2K DSL's they fixed the boards. Look for those years.
Maybe they learned from mesa. Remember that terrible clip they had of the Mesa markiic reissue?What they don’t get is that tonal modifications are best captured in video/audio and not text.
Please share these settings...
“Trust us, everyone here at Sweetwater who has heard these mods loves how it does that…well…kinda like..oh, you know the thing..!”What they don’t get is that tonal modifications are best captured in video/audio and not text.
Maybe they learned from mesa. Remember that terrible clip they had of the Mesa markiic reissue?
I hear the 100HR heads are solid though?If you look up user reviews on the newest DSL amps on GC there’s a lot of reports of the amps dying in a month or two, sometimes multiple amps with the same owner after they exchange them.
I also heard that the DSL 2000 50 watt was Jim's favorite amp and why they did the 1923.. wonder if that is true?Not sure about the better parts... different graphics and limited edition. If anyone knows if they were the same internally or were upgraded somehow, I'd be curious to hear more.
I also heard that the DSL 2000 50 watt was Jim's favorite amp and why they did the 1923.. wonder if that is true?
Yeah this is baffling, but weirdly common.What they don’t get is that tonal modifications are best captured in video/audio and not text.
Yeah this is baffling, but weirdly common.
Decently-captured audio is such an obvious choice for marketing any audio related product, yet so many manufacturers don’t bother.
I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve been looking into an amp, then lost interest because of this omission.
![]()
Seems if'in i was to be sellin mApZ id at least have some audio / video of it to get the GAS cultivating.
Its not like Marshall & SW would be 35 yrs out of touch with their base or anything.
I am very interested in getting one, so I called Sweetwater and was told the 2 year warranty does apply to this amp. I have decided to await the YouTube clips from the expected guys we all know and love.Yeah that’s a valid point. The questions I know I’d be asking though would be what is Sweetwater’s return policy on modified gear? Do they take the professional stance and say return policies are extended? Or the shady stance and say return policies are removed or differ from normal new gear? Is a restocking fee applied to modified gear and if so does it differ from normal gear?
Claiming something is modified for more money from a big box store is more salesman tactic for hype than actual care IMO. If they cared they’d have it well characterized and talk more about the professional stance. The fact they do neither seems concerning to me and shady.
Sound clips of the 40. Dude says they modded tho gain channel to sound like a 900. Lol