
RaceU4her
Well-known member
never the SLO and some of the guys I think have great tone have leaned on them in thepast.
Who? I’m always looking to hear good slo tones
never the SLO and some of the guys I think have great tone have leaned on them in thepast.
Lynch and VH were the 2 i was specifically referencingWho? I’m always looking to hear good slo tones
I own a 101B and have extensive playtime on a real SLO a buddy owned. You have the better amp IMO.SLO. never played or had one. I've had lots of cool amps and i own my desert island amp (101b) but never the SLO and some of the guys I think have great tone have leaned on them in thepast. I suspect the new SLO pedal will be my first foray into that arena lol
Agreed, although I remember this one ‘90’s VHT UL I tried being a lot more saturated and compressed than the Fryette UL I owned. The Omega Obsidian also is very dry. I honestly hate the Splawn’s and don’t like much the Fryette’s (not because of the dryness). Yeah I guess the 1996 Wizard MC I had would’ve been more saturated than those amps. The 2016 MTL I have now would be I think the driest amp I’ve got of my 27 amps. The only other amp I have currently that leans dry is my 1997 Blueface VH4. I don’t mind dry at all actually, but I really don’t like hollow mids and favor tonal complexity & nuance, and seems to be that those types of amps tend not to be dry usually
it's just freakin' fantastic. super versatile, and at the same time, I take it to gigs and basically just boost the blue channel all night lolI own a 101B and have extensive playtime on a real SLO a buddy owned. You have the better amp IMO.
Maybe we just have different semantics for describing tone, but seems we both like the VH4. To me amps like the VH4 ch3, Pittbull UL, and Omega Obsidian are the definition of dry high gain tone, while amps like the 5150’s/6505’s, Uberschall’s, Cameron’s, XTC’s, Butterslax and what I consider to be saturated/wet/greasy high gain tones. It’s been a while since I last tried a regular vh4, but I consider my ‘97 Blueface to be an open/less compressed high gain amp. Not as open as the Wizard’s, but it fills up the room in a way that you just don’t get in the more compressed amps like my Uber, Beta or a 5150Maybe we all have different ideas of what "dry" means lol. I've had a few VH4s and none of them were what I would consider dry. They are quite saturated, wet, and very compressed to my ears, with an immediate attack. There is a certain quality that is very unique to Diezel. Can't put my finger on it. The VH4 pairs very well with a Marshall in stereo to fill in the sonic space.