Why do forum members think that saying "ghey" or "gaey" magically shields them from being called bigots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nightlight
  • Start date Start date
You MUST apply context...they're jokes in good spirit with no malice applied.
The purposely and constantly offended don't know the concept of context.

I have no idea how something so simple is so hard for a "certain type of person" to understand

"Demonizing the gays" is that douchebags orwellian newspeak for "you MUST agree with all of MY opinions on sexuality or else"

I have nothing against the gays, and I have nothing against christians who dont like the gay, that's immaterial to the rules which hundreds of people have no problem grasping

I seriously don't know how this idiots show up wanting to play barbie at the baseball field and then have a conniption fit about everyone swinging bats around
 
Can you make even ONE post without an anatomy reference?
1788894786635.png
 
I have no idea how something so simple is so hard for a "certain type of person" to understand

"Demonizing the gays" is that douchebags orwellian newspeak for "you MUST agree with all of MY opinions on sexuality or else"

I have nothing against the gays, and I have nothing against christians who dont like the gay, that's immaterial to the rules which hundreds of people have no problem grasping

I seriously don't know how this idiots show up wanting to play barbie at the baseball field and then have a conniption fit about everyone swinging bats around
I fully agree with you...often!

Some individuals need chaos and drama to function and it appears this person was one of them.
 
I fully agree with you...often!

Some individuals need chaos and drama to function and it appears this person was one of them.

Like just as an example

That would be breaking the rules if someone harassed a gay member for being gay

Just like it would be against the rules to call a member racial slurs or whatever

But making fun of a famously fruity musician is so obviously in-bounds, it should be self-evident

There's a clear, defined, easy to understand line that everyone gets

And it's obvious why the line is drawn there - that way we get the maximum amount of opinions and everyone can express themselves without bullying or shitting on someone unnecessarily
 
Like just as an example

That would be breaking the rules if someone harassed a gay member for being gay

Just like it would be against the rules to call a member racial slurs or whatever

But making fun of a famously fruity musician is so obviously in-bounds, it should be self-evident

There's a clear, defined, easy to understand line that everyone gets

And it's obvious why the line is drawn there - that way we get the maximum amount of opinions and everyone can express themselves without bullying or shitting on someone unnecessarily
General use of racial slurs not directed at anyone specifically are more or less off limits because they are offensive but people can say fag and homo as long as they arent directing it at anyone?
 
General use of racial slurs not directed at anyone specifically are more or less off limits because they are offensive but people can say fag and homo as long as they arent directing it at anyone?

It's more of a mod discretion thing, but generally speaking that's just how it turns out.

We've never (at least since i've been a mod) had huge issues with fag and homo getting directed at anyone in a malicious way

We have, however, had issues with people using racial slurs (even though most of those members are no longer here) in a malicious way

So it's not that they are different definitionally, it's that they are different in enforcement because of the way the forum behaves
 
So @VonBonfire 999/1000 times when someone gets directly called a fag or a homo

It isn't a "you have the big gay and i'm going to call you a fag and a homo for being gay"

It's more like it's said at someone who isn't gay, or even if they are its for something unrelated to buttsex

There's a very clear distinction in those things
 
Like just as an example

That would be breaking the rules if someone harassed a gay member for being gay

Just like it would be against the rules to call a member racial slurs or whatever

But making fun of a famously fruity musician is so obviously in-bounds, it should be self-evident

There's a clear, defined, easy to understand line that everyone gets

And it's obvious why the line is drawn there - that way we get the maximum amount of opinions and everyone can express themselves without bullying or shitting on someone unnecessarily
You poor bastard for the shit you have to put up with for meager return.

It was mentioned the other day but once again, discuss and please consider setting up a fund where we can supplement your earnings.

Yourself, The Monkey and Japetus of course.

https://www.gofundme.com/create/fundraiser/category
 
It's more of a mod discretion thing, but generally speaking that's just how it turns out.

We've never (at least since i've been a mod) had huge issues with fag and homo getting directed at anyone in a malicious way

We have, however, had issues with people using racial slurs (even though most of those members are no longer here) in a malicious way

So it's not that they are different definitionally, it's that they are different in enforcement because of the way the forum behaves
I try to avoid using the gay slurs these days for similar reasons. I have a good friend who is gay, i told him ive probably been called a fag more times than he has since that was the insult of choice of the people i grew up around. Lol
 
I try to avoid using the gay slurs these days for similar reasons. I have a good friend who is gay, i told him ive probably been called a fag more times than he has since that was the insult of choice of the people i grew up around. Lol

Ironically, not once have we ever had problems with "white supremacists" or neonazis calling people racial slurs - it's invariably been the super Marxist types.

If we had an influx of Christian supremacists or something who really hated the big gay, maybe our enforcement would change? Or more likely, some crazy super commie would harass a gay conservative until the rule changed honestly.

Because that's what the pattern has been, over and over.
 
You poor bastard for the shit you have to put up with for meager return.

It was mentioned the other day but once again, discuss and please consider setting up a fund where we can supplement your earnings.

Yourself, The Monkey and Japetus of course.

https://www.gofundme.com/create/fundraiser/category

I dont know if we would need to go whole hog with a GoFundMe, I don't know if that's necessary

But I'm sure Brian could use some bass strings or Nicky could use some kemper profiles 🤷
 
Ironically, not once have we ever had problems with "white supremacists" or neonazis calling people racial slurs - it's invariably been the super Marxist types.
All bets are off with those types once you disagree with their worldview or don't fit the profile they weirdly expect from a given race/ethnicity/sexual choice. They'll sink to any level and think it's justifiable.

If we had an influx of Christian supremacists or something who really hated the big gay, maybe our enforcement would change? Or more likely, some crazy super commie would harass a gay conservative until the rule changed honestly.
Lol, I don't think I've ever met a Christian supremacist before. It's kind of an oxymoron in reality but I suppose they exist in some form.
 
All bets are off with those types once you disagree with their worldview or don't fit the profile they weirdly expect from a given race/ethnicity/sexual choice. They'll sink to any level and think it's justifiable.


Lol, I don't think I've ever met a Christian supremacist before. It's kind of an oxymoron in reality but I suppose they exist in some form.

Yeah never met one.

Of course, by their retarded definitions, any Christian who wants the west to remain the west is a "Christian supremacist"

But you don't have to be religious to believe that 🤷
 
Of course, by their retarded definitions, any Christian who wants the west to remain the west is a "Christian supremacist"
I'm glad some of the craziness of the far left has lost traction with the general public but I fear violence will be their next modus operandi rather than just trying to hijack language and culture "peacefully". I have real concerns with what will happen if they gain majority control of white house, senate, and congress or even the larger share of two of those....
 
I'm glad some of the craziness of the far left has lost traction with the general public but I fear violence will be their next modus operandi rather than just trying to hijack language and culture "peacefully". I have real concerns with what will happen if they gain majority control of white house, senate, and congress or even the larger share of two of those....
it's not even "next" it's "already happened and happening"
 
it's not even "next" it's "already happened and happening"
Yeah you are right. I guess I'm thinking of how things went during the bolshevik revolution. Doesn't seem like they are really there yet among rank and file short of urban protests being funded and supplied by evil billionaires and protected by a few dirty D.A's. Again, harnessing the political control, WH, senate, house..

Honestly working on/thinking about ways I can bail out since I have always voted with my feet and Trump seems to be leaving the door wide open for the next president to be a "socialist" dem (read: communist). Not sure that will net anything but a temporary solution but I'm getting too old to be doing a bunch of fighting with people half my age or less.
 
Dude, I hope you realise that "goy" means something completely different than "gay", right? If not, time to brush up on yer Hebrew/Yiddish. šŸ¤“


I'm glad someone finally said it, I thought it flew overhead. It's literally like the Nazis burning books to do away with proscribed knowledge. And we all know how that turned out, don't we?

In a way, it is the subjugation of thought and free will and free speech when you tell something he must not say something and also not think of it. Thinkspeak was what it was called in 1984.

It's the gradual bending of the people into sheltered cucks, who Gen Z and Millenials laugh about and call boomers because the world was handed on a plate to them. They're easily manipulated, the poor saps.

I have no problem being called goy, but I do have a problem being called gay. Does that make sense?
 
Back
Top