NoHassle
Well-known member
Again...what do you expect from me...an invitation to play scrabble.Can you make even ONE post without an anatomy reference?
Again...what do you expect from me...an invitation to play scrabble.Can you make even ONE post without an anatomy reference?
The purposely and constantly offended don't know the concept of context.You MUST apply context...they're jokes in good spirit with no malice applied.
You MUST apply context...they're jokes in good spirit with no malice applied.
The purposely and constantly offended don't know the concept of context.
Can you make even ONE post without an anatomy reference?
I fully agree with you...often!I have no idea how something so simple is so hard for a "certain type of person" to understand
"Demonizing the gays" is that douchebags orwellian newspeak for "you MUST agree with all of MY opinions on sexuality or else"
I have nothing against the gays, and I have nothing against christians who dont like the gay, that's immaterial to the rules which hundreds of people have no problem grasping
I seriously don't know how this idiots show up wanting to play barbie at the baseball field and then have a conniption fit about everyone swinging bats around
You would teach me words i dont need to know, lol.Again...what do you expect from me...an invitation to play scrabble.![]()
I fully agree with you...often!
Some individuals need chaos and drama to function and it appears this person was one of them.
General use of racial slurs not directed at anyone specifically are more or less off limits because they are offensive but people can say fag and homo as long as they arent directing it at anyone?Like just as an example
That would be breaking the rules if someone harassed a gay member for being gay
Just like it would be against the rules to call a member racial slurs or whatever
But making fun of a famously fruity musician is so obviously in-bounds, it should be self-evident
There's a clear, defined, easy to understand line that everyone gets
And it's obvious why the line is drawn there - that way we get the maximum amount of opinions and everyone can express themselves without bullying or shitting on someone unnecessarily
General use of racial slurs not directed at anyone specifically are more or less off limits because they are offensive but people can say fag and homo as long as they arent directing it at anyone?
You poor bastard for the shit you have to put up with for meager return.Like just as an example
That would be breaking the rules if someone harassed a gay member for being gay
Just like it would be against the rules to call a member racial slurs or whatever
But making fun of a famously fruity musician is so obviously in-bounds, it should be self-evident
There's a clear, defined, easy to understand line that everyone gets
And it's obvious why the line is drawn there - that way we get the maximum amount of opinions and everyone can express themselves without bullying or shitting on someone unnecessarily
I try to avoid using the gay slurs these days for similar reasons. I have a good friend who is gay, i told him ive probably been called a fag more times than he has since that was the insult of choice of the people i grew up around. LolIt's more of a mod discretion thing, but generally speaking that's just how it turns out.
We've never (at least since i've been a mod) had huge issues with fag and homo getting directed at anyone in a malicious way
We have, however, had issues with people using racial slurs (even though most of those members are no longer here) in a malicious way
So it's not that they are different definitionally, it's that they are different in enforcement because of the way the forum behaves
I try to avoid using the gay slurs these days for similar reasons. I have a good friend who is gay, i told him ive probably been called a fag more times than he has since that was the insult of choice of the people i grew up around. Lol
You poor bastard for the shit you have to put up with for meager return.
It was mentioned the other day but once again, discuss and please consider setting up a fund where we can supplement your earnings.
Yourself, The Monkey and Japetus of course.
https://www.gofundme.com/create/fundraiser/category
All bets are off with those types once you disagree with their worldview or don't fit the profile they weirdly expect from a given race/ethnicity/sexual choice. They'll sink to any level and think it's justifiable.Ironically, not once have we ever had problems with "white supremacists" or neonazis calling people racial slurs - it's invariably been the super Marxist types.
Lol, I don't think I've ever met a Christian supremacist before. It's kind of an oxymoron in reality but I suppose they exist in some form.If we had an influx of Christian supremacists or something who really hated the big gay, maybe our enforcement would change? Or more likely, some crazy super commie would harass a gay conservative until the rule changed honestly.
All bets are off with those types once you disagree with their worldview or don't fit the profile they weirdly expect from a given race/ethnicity/sexual choice. They'll sink to any level and think it's justifiable.
Lol, I don't think I've ever met a Christian supremacist before. It's kind of an oxymoron in reality but I suppose they exist in some form.
I'm glad some of the craziness of the far left has lost traction with the general public but I fear violence will be their next modus operandi rather than just trying to hijack language and culture "peacefully". I have real concerns with what will happen if they gain majority control of white house, senate, and congress or even the larger share of two of those....Of course, by their retarded definitions, any Christian who wants the west to remain the west is a "Christian supremacist"
it's not even "next" it's "already happened and happening"I'm glad some of the craziness of the far left has lost traction with the general public but I fear violence will be their next modus operandi rather than just trying to hijack language and culture "peacefully". I have real concerns with what will happen if they gain majority control of white house, senate, and congress or even the larger share of two of those....
Yeah you are right. I guess I'm thinking of how things went during the bolshevik revolution. Doesn't seem like they are really there yet among rank and file short of urban protests being funded and supplied by evil billionaires and protected by a few dirty D.A's. Again, harnessing the political control, WH, senate, house..it's not even "next" it's "already happened and happening"
Dude, I hope you realise that "goy" means something completely different than "gay", right? If not, time to brush up on yer Hebrew/Yiddish.![]()