And just like that the Bankrupt USA is going to moon all of a sudden...............

  • Thread starter Thread starter harddriver
  • Start date Start date
What about religious documents, doctrines or events—did you witness them firsthand or do you take them on faith from institutions that came before you?
It should be taken on faith when the institutions are proven trustworthy. The US government lost the little credibility it had left in 1913, so nothing they've done or stated after that point should be trusted or believed. Further, in the modern era, in collusion with other entities like google, search results for many of these topics are parsed in a way that it has made it more difficult to find anything that doesn't reinforce their claims. Suppressing opposing ideas is not the mark of the free country they tell us we live in.
 
And religious institutions have proven themselves to be trustworthy?
No, by and large they haven't. There is one true church, the rest are schismatics, heretics, or breakaways from other schismatic or heretical churches.
 
No, by and large they haven't. There is one true church, the rest are schismatics, heretics, or breakaways from other schismatic or heretical churches.
Every church claims to be the real church.

Let me quote Mark Knopfler

"Two men say they're Jesus / One of them must be wrong"
 
What about " Wherever two or more are gathered in his name". Straight outta the bible homey.
Written by Matthew, a foundational saint in the orthodox church. Gathered in who's name? Who's version of Christ? There are plenty of "christians" out there I'm not locking hands with in prayer, believe that. I think it would be good to consider that anyone can quote a verse here or there and make it mean any number of things. Either you trust in the unbroken chain of succession within orthodoxy and 2000 years of history and canon law, or you trust in schismatics, heretics, and self appointed teachers.
 
Written by Matthew, a foundational saint in the orthodox church. Gathered in who's name? Who's version of Christ? There are plenty of "christians" out there I'm not locking hands with in prayer, believe that. I think it would be good to consider that anyone can quote a verse here or there and make it mean any number of things. Either you trust in the unbroken chain of succession within orthodoxy and 2000 years of history and canon law, or you trust in schismatics, heretics, and self appointed teachers.
Where does it say that in the bible ?
 
Where does it say what in the bible?
Either you trust in the unbroken chain of succession within orthodoxy and 2000 years of history and canon law, or you trust in schismatics, heretics, and self appointed teachers.
 
Either you trust in the unbroken chain of succession within orthodoxy and 2000 years of history and canon law, or you trust in schismatics, heretics, and self appointed teachers.
You suggested two random people who confess christ and get together automatically makes jesus present among them? Jehovah's witnesses? Mormons? A new ager who confesses the maitreya christ? Who? Confess which christ? There are many false christs. Even the demons confess Christ in the book of Mark.
 
You suggested two random people who confess christ and get together automatically makes jesus present among them? Jehovah's witnesses? Mormons? A new ager who confesses the maitreya christ? Who? Confess which christ? There are many false christs. Even the demons confess Christ in the book of Mark.
Pretty sure the bible was talking about the real Jesus.

Where does it talk about the unbroken succession of orthodoxy and canon law ?

Dude, I understand it's coming off like I'm fucking with you. I'm really not. I'm just trying to understand why you think your beliefs are the only true ones. And maybe point out that all people who have religious beliefs probably think theirs is the only truth. It's not our place to judge, ( you know, unless your truth involves suicide vests, killing jews and other infidels, etc.) The bible says anyone who believes Christ is the son of god, who died for your sins and is baptized in his name shall be saved. It doesn't say anything about canon law or the unbroken succession of orthodoxy. Is it your position that anyone who disagrees with your ideology is not going to live in eternity in the kingdom of god ?
 
Pretty sure the bible was talking about the real Jesus.
Right, which 250+ denominations now profess to worship. So which one is the real Jesus?

Where does it talk about the unbroken succession of orthodoxy and canon law ?
Every church has a statement of faith, every denomination offers theological arguments to support their stance. Orthodoxy has 2000 years of canon law, and ecumencial councils, in order to eliminate this kind of confusion every schismatic and heretical sect is suffers from.

Dude, I understand it's coming off like I'm fucking with you. I'm really not.
I wasn't getting that at all. You asked a legitimate question.

I'm just trying to understand why you think your beliefs are the only true ones. And maybe point out that all people who have religious beliefs probably think theirs is the only truth. It's not our place to judge, ( you know, unless your truth involves suicide vests, killing jews and other infidels, etc.) The bible says anyone who believes Christ is the son of god, who died for your sins and is baptized in his name shall be saved. It doesn't say anything about canon law or the unbroken succession of orthodoxy. Is it your position that anyone who disagrees with your ideology is not going to live in eternity in the kingdom of god ?
That isn't my position. I don't have a position, the church does. The church's position is that those who are not orthodox will be treated as outside the orthodox church. Since neither I, nor any of the church fathers are in charge of the judgement, we do not claim to know how God will deal with someone who is a follower of Christ, but does so outside of orthodoxy. Having been on both sides of the coin I can tell you that a christian outside of orthodoxy misses out on the most important, and meaningful parts of the faith, namely the sacraments. It's not a judgement against them but rather my own personal experience.
 
@VonBonfire
1775795185948.jpeg
 
What are we arguing about here......


Can't people be happy America is doing something cool, like going to the moon 😎
 
Right, which 250+ denominations now profess to worship. So which one is the real Jesus?
This implies each denomination worships a different or fake Jesus. I understand it more as each (Christian) denomination worships the same Jesus, just in different ways.

I think that's sorta what @Floyd Eye was getting at. The minor details of ceremony and whatnot aren't as important, and it's accepting Jesus that matters.
 
Gotta say I concur with both of you guys.

Those poor millions who've been saved via missionaries on remote islands would have no hope if they had to attend EO or any other non-local denomination churches in order to "fully qualify".

IMHO the overarching message of the Bible is "Who so ever believes in Him...". There is no additional qualifier.

John 3:16
"For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life."
 

Similar threads

H
Replies
6
Views
450
Music&Chaos
Music&Chaos
ZEEGLER
Replies
71
Views
4K
311boogieman
311boogieman
MrDowntown
Replies
75
Views
4K
* velcro-fly *
* velcro-fly *
TheBiggestJerk
Replies
8
Views
912
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
Back
Top