F
Findthetone1
Well-known member
Know that as fact?Does Iran pose an imminent threat to the US? No.
Know that as fact?Does Iran pose an imminent threat to the US? No.
It's on a map, but I have never experienced it first hand. I'm willing to take it on faith that it does. Unless you have been there you are also taking it on faith.Do you believe Iran is a real country that physically exists?
Thank you for your candor. You're the only one who actually answered. Much appreciated.I don't know what you mean by "innocent"
Does Iran pose an imminent threat to the US? No.
Is a country that seeks to defend itself against regional enemies with nuclear weapons capability guilty of something? Not in my opinion.
You mean did your brother hack my account.Did the-kid hack your account?
You two faced ass kisserThank you for your candor. You're the only one who actually answered. Much appreciated.
Know that as fact?
I'm a single-assed face kisser.You two faced ass kisser
It's on a map, but I have never experienced it first hand. I'm willing to take it on faith that it does. Unless you have been there you are also taking it on faith.
No I haven't. Blues guitar and orthodox theology are my main interests.ok, I get it. Ever study metaphysics?
Interesting. Could be possible. Looking back at her statements from past years, she can be a bit contradictory. What I do find interesting, is that if you are going to make a statement that carries so much weight in the current climate, why isn't it referenced in the actual report?I only know what the current Director of National Intelligence communicates publicly. https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/os-gabbard-031826.pdf
As a result of Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated. There has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. The entrances to the underground facilities that were bombed have been buried and shuttered with cement. We continue to monitor for any early indicators on what position the current or any new leadership in Iran will take with regard to authorizing a nuclear weapons program.
Doesn't sound imminent to me
I'm not a baptist but nice try.Someone here loves "The Devil's Music".
Hahhaahhahahhahaha
It's her opening testimony from last month's Senate Intelligence hearing. You're right, she doesn't explicitly mention it there, but she was later asked the question directly by a Senator (there's videos online). She said it is not her job to determine imminent threat assessments-- it's the Presidents. Of course, that is not true. It is the job of the Intelligence Director to determine threat assessments, it's the job of the President to act on those assessments.Interesting. Could be possible. Looking back at her statements from past years, she can be a bit contradictory. What I do find interesting, is that if you are going to make a statement that carries so much weight in the current climate, why isn't it referenced in the actual report?
That's the kind of thing that seems contradictory to me.![]()
There are parallels between metaphysics and theology, they get at the same thing but with different starting points. Metaphysics is more of a "secular" theology, which is probably an oversimplificationNo I haven't. Blues guitar and orthodox theology are my main interests.
When looking for truths, consistencies is one the first things you look for. There certainly seem to be some lack of it which would lead persons to speculate that there is dishonestly coming from somewhere. Whether it be for self-preservation, personal gain or some other nefarious agenda. It's the swamp, so the truth may never be known.It's her opening testimony from last month's Senate Intelligence hearing. You're right, she doesn't explicitly mention it there, but she was later asked the question directly by a Senator (there's videos online). She said it is not her job to determine imminent threat assessments-- it's the Presidents. Of course, that is not true. It is the job of the Intelligence Director to determine threat assessments, it's the job of the President to act on those assessments.
Me thinks she didn't want to go against the grain, or the White House, otherwise she would be another Noem or Bondi. Joe Kent was preemptive, he explicitly said there was no imminent threat, then of course resigned. Kent inferred there were "special interests" pushing the President to attack. Hmm, who could that be?
That being said, there is no sympathy from me for the destruction of that terrorist country. It is tragic and unfortunate innocent people have died as a result of the years of actions coming out of that country.
I blame the failed concept of Globalism. If everybody just minded their own fucking business, things would probably be quieter. But once you let a rat look in your pantry, they know what they can get.I don't disagree. And I I'm kind of agnostic on "nation building."
But there was a lesson learned from Iraq. Saddam was an equally brutal dictator that would take out your entire lineage if you went against him. We took him out and created a bigger fucking mess and power vacuum for every fringe radical group in the region. Turns out, in that part of the world, sheer brutality and torture keeps regional order and stability. Terror served a functional purpose for us. Probably not a good thing to admit on Good Friday![]()
You mean you're really a sphincter sucker.I'm a single-assed face kisser.
Does that apply to us or just everyone else as usual?I blame the failed concept of Globalism. If everybody just minded their own fucking business, things would probably be quieter. But once you let a rat look in your pantry, they know what they can get.