Fuck SweetWater........ They have been destroying and have destroyed the American Music Industry : (

  • Thread starter Thread starter The~Kid
  • Start date Start date
Two things:
1) it’s clear the word “monopoly” doesn’t mean what the OP thinks it means. Business success and monopolistic practices are entirely different

2) The irony of someone who can barely articulate a coherent thought arguing that everyone else lacks “critical thinking” skills is hilarious

I'm afraid common sense isn't something you should be preaching. You're so far out in left field, I'm not sure you're even from planet earth. You should unplug your keyboard and take a vacation or something. You just ramble and babble, and rarely have anything coherent to say.

Its pretty surprising how many folks, not all but yeah..... Who happen to love shopping at SweetWater/Amazon don't understand basic maths......


But given the state of modern education is it really a surprise :unsure: :dunno: :yes:
 
Last edited:
Impossible with you. Good day.
Yes yes...... Good luck spending all day looking at past post..... Have a good day.


Reposting my post from months ago for whatever odd reason..... Seems like the only interesting thing you can do nowadays is repost my old as post from months ago nvm repost my threads too :dunno:
 
Agreed. There is only 1 person in this thread, I believe, that feels like a monopoly law has been broken :dunno:
He finally agreed with me that this is not the case:

By current laws that define a Monopoly and under this premise using inductive reasoning SweetWater isn't breaking any law or is an actual Monopoly......... And this is 100% true and I agree with this 100%.
Indy summed it up perfectly IMHO:

... Business success and monopolistic practices are entirely different...
 
Given inductive reasoning and laws as they are today SweetWater really isn't a Monopoly at all..... Much like Amazon ain't a Monopoly either. And this is true 100%.... Under such premises.

But oppositely, given basic numbers, common sense, maths and deductive reasoning with a probability/likelihood and estimates they most probably and most likely are under this premise. Its ultimately a very interesting debate and well......


This is why Opposing Viewpoints matter on the subject or any such subject amongst healthy debates. Both parties and Viewpoints have presented their arguments in the best, sound and cogent or valid way they could...... Using the best objective reasoning and arguments...... And using basic maths, basic numbers, basic logic and basic reasoning. Anyone IMO has a free choice to believe in either side of the debate presented given both sides of this argument.


Given the arguments presented by common sense, basic and pure logic and objective reasoning as best they could by both perspectives for either deductive or inductive arguments makes this a very healthy debate IMO :dunno:
 
Last edited:
^ That doesn't make any sense as usual. Another rambling, incoherent grammatic failure :dunno:

An interesting debate? LOL

Both parties viewpoints have been presented in a sound way? No offense, but are you crazy? You are the only one in your "party" and it wasn't presented coherently and by some standards - would be considered libel. I bet Providence and Ernie Ball and MXR and Bad Cat would be thrilled to have you as spokesperson :confused:


Yes yes...... Good luck spending all day looking at past post..... Have a good day.


Reposting my post from months ago for whatever odd reason..... Seems like the only interesting thing you can do nowadays is repost my old as post from months ago nvm repost my threads too :dunno:

All day? It takes about 7 seconds to use the search bar and copy/paste :dunno:

Just like your Labubu thread :lol:
And "stickying"
I'm just providing context. Deal with it.

He finally agreed with me that this is not the case:

He agreed that it is not a Monopoly? Using inductive reasoning? And why only you? But it is a monopoly using deductive reasoning? So this whole thread is troll thread. Not breaking any rules, but fair game for attack I'd say. Hence my "opposing" thread where I 'stickied' this pile of crap thread. As usual, he gets backed into a corner and does this back tracking exercise and 'apologizes'. Annoying AF.

Sorry - no disrespect to you MM. I'm done now :lol:
 
^ That doesn't make any sense as usual. Another rambling, incoherent grammatic failure :dunno:

An interesting debate? LOL

Both parties viewpoints have been presented in a sound way? No offense, but are you crazy? You are the only one in your "party" and it wasn't presented coherently and by some standards - would be considered libel. I bet Providence and Ernie Ball and MXR and Bad Cat would be thrilled to have you as spokesperson :confused:




All day? It takes about 7 seconds to use the search bar and copy/paste :dunno:

Just like your Labubu thread :lol:
And "stickying"
I'm just providing context. Deal with it.



He agreed that it is not a Monopoly? Using inductive reasoning? And why only you? But it is a monopoly using deductive reasoning? So this whole thread is troll thread. Not breaking any rules, but fair game for attack I'd say. Hence my "opposing" thread where I 'stickied' this pile of crap thread. As usual, he gets backed into a corner and does this back tracking exercise and 'apologizes'. Annoying AF.

Sorry - no disrespect to you MM. I'm done now :lol:
Yeah sure pal....... It actually makes every bit of sense and as said hey SweetWater and Amazon aren't a Monopoly given current laws based on inductive reasoning, what is so hard to understand about that or make sense of?

Apparently, the only way you can come up with anything interesting to say or do is just to copy my threads and paste them on your OPs.

Its pretty wild how many old post of mine you go through and sticky in other post too........ You know all day like you do. Can't come up with anything original to say as most of your post consist of copy/paste or other crap written by AI such as in your thread where you sticky my thread in OP.


I mean who has time for this right and a pretty weird obsession bro....... :dunno:


1000001500.png
 
Last edited:
I'm afraid common sense isn't something you should be preaching. You're so far out in left field, I'm not sure you're even from planet earth. You should unplug your keyboard and take a vacation or something. You just ramble and babble, and rarely have anything coherent to say.
Goddamnit! Napalm jumps in late in the game with sense. And look at that grammar. His use of your/you're..... BULLETPROOF
 
The best lesson I've learned here is that 100% of most average people look at debates, propositions or whatever other contest in a win or lose scenario...... This is a fact nvm the below average people..... In general....facts.


100% of people who accept a proposition or enter a debate think they can win 100% of the time......why else would they accept to it.......... facts.

And there is actually a third option no one thinks of..... More facts.



And yeah sometimes you cant win but that doesn't mean you have to lose...... There isn't just winning and losing and 100% of average or below average people have never realized that or care to think of that..... Facts.


But yeah sometimes you cant win..... But that doesn't mean you have to lose....... If you cant win.... The next best option and probably the better option in a way is not losing.... Not winning doesn't mean you have to lose and not losing is another and better option as said sometimes no one ever really thinks about.......


And that is something the average person, nvm the below average person never cares to think about 100% of the time. Facts :unsure::dunno::yes:
 
Last edited:
The best lesson I've learned here is that 100% of most average people look at debates, propositions or whatever other contest in a win or lose scenario...... This is a fact nvm the below average people..... In general....facts.


100% of people who accept a proposition or enter a debate think they can win 100% of the time......why else would they accept to it.......... facts.

And there is actually a third option no one thinks of..... More facts.



And yeah sometimes you cant win but that doesn't mean you have to lose...... There isn't just winning and losing and 100% of average or below average people have never realized that or care to think of that..... Facts.


But yeah sometimes you cant win..... But that doesn't mean you have to lose....... If you cant win.... The next best option and probably the better option in a way is not losing.... Not winning doesn't mean you have to lose and not losing is another and better option as said sometimes no one ever really thinks about.......


And that is something the average person, nvm the below average person never cares to think about 100% of the time. Facts :unsure::dunno::yes:
You use the word "facts" an awful lot for someone who has said a shit ton of factually incorrect things in this thread.
 
The forums I participate in have nothing to do with you being a rambling, incoherent mess throughout this entire thread. And most threads, really.
So you don't understand basic numbers/maths..... Not even the basic, simple ones in the thread..... Its just simple multiplication, division, subtraction and addition my man.....



Par for the course with todays below average education I guess and can't blame someone for being a product of their environment or being a TGP Lover...... Facts :dunno:
 
Back
Top