Gutmann
Member
Hell...yes I am
I mean, there's still GAS for stuff but I'm completely happy with this little corner...
I mean, there's still GAS for stuff but I'm completely happy with this little corner...
Mark IV's are said to have very vocal-like leads.amiller":3h8uzl3d said:Almoooooooosssst there.![]()
![]()
I like the XTC but it just falls short of having that vocal sound I want.
My Lonestar has the vocal tone I want but just falls short of having enough gain.
I like both amps...but no cigar. I don't know is there something in between those two amps?
SpiritCrusher86":3v3ke10k said:Mark IV's are said to have very vocal-like leads.amiller":3v3ke10k said:Almoooooooosssst there.![]()
![]()
I like the XTC but it just falls short of having that vocal sound I want.
My Lonestar has the vocal tone I want but just falls short of having enough gain.
I like both amps...but no cigar. I don't know is there something in between those two amps?
How about just boosting the Lonestar a bit?amiller":2fx9h94a said:SpiritCrusher86":2fx9h94a said:Mark IV's are said to have very vocal-like leads.amiller":2fx9h94a said:Almoooooooosssst there.![]()
![]()
I like the XTC but it just falls short of having that vocal sound I want.
My Lonestar has the vocal tone I want but just falls short of having enough gain.
I like both amps...but no cigar. I don't know is there something in between those two amps?
I've got a Mark IV. I actually like the Lonestar more.
Vrad":263xktx1 said:How about just boosting the Lonestar a bit?amiller":263xktx1 said:SpiritCrusher86":263xktx1 said:Mark IV's are said to have very vocal-like leads.amiller":263xktx1 said:Almoooooooosssst there.![]()
![]()
I like the XTC but it just falls short of having that vocal sound I want.
My Lonestar has the vocal tone I want but just falls short of having enough gain.
I like both amps...but no cigar. I don't know is there something in between those two amps?
I've got a Mark IV. I actually like the Lonestar more.
amiller":2fot9xq0 said:Vrad":2fot9xq0 said:How about just boosting the Lonestar a bit?amiller":2fot9xq0 said:SpiritCrusher86":2fot9xq0 said:Mark IV's are said to have very vocal-like leads.amiller":2fot9xq0 said:Almoooooooosssst there.![]()
![]()
I like the XTC but it just falls short of having that vocal sound I want.
My Lonestar has the vocal tone I want but just falls short of having enough gain.
I like both amps...but no cigar. I don't know is there something in between those two amps?
I've got a Mark IV. I actually like the Lonestar more.
Yeah, I am boosting the Lonestar and it sounds really good...'just not quite enough aggression. I mean, I can live with the tone and like it and record with it. But "totally" satisfied...not really there yet.
Lots of people here could replace that word with 'ever'Vrad":3tcpgzyd said:amiller":3tcpgzyd said:Vrad":3tcpgzyd said:How about just boosting the Lonestar a bit?amiller":3tcpgzyd said:SpiritCrusher86":3tcpgzyd said:Mark IV's are said to have very vocal-like leads.amiller":3tcpgzyd said:Almoooooooosssst there.![]()
![]()
I like the XTC but it just falls short of having that vocal sound I want.
My Lonestar has the vocal tone I want but just falls short of having enough gain.
I like both amps...but no cigar. I don't know is there something in between those two amps?
I've got a Mark IV. I actually like the Lonestar more.
Yeah, I am boosting the Lonestar and it sounds really good...'just not quite enough aggression. I mean, I can live with the tone and like it and record with it. But "totally" satisfied...not really there yet.
"yet"?![]()
![]()
LOL!Randy Van Sykes":hqdm7mib said:Lots of people here could replace that word with 'ever'Vrad":hqdm7mib said:amiller":hqdm7mib said:Vrad":hqdm7mib said:How about just boosting the Lonestar a bit?amiller":hqdm7mib said:SpiritCrusher86":hqdm7mib said:Mark IV's are said to have very vocal-like leads.amiller":hqdm7mib said:Almoooooooosssst there.![]()
![]()
I like the XTC but it just falls short of having that vocal sound I want.
My Lonestar has the vocal tone I want but just falls short of having enough gain.
I like both amps...but no cigar. I don't know is there something in between those two amps?
I've got a Mark IV. I actually like the Lonestar more.
Yeah, I am boosting the Lonestar and it sounds really good...'just not quite enough aggression. I mean, I can live with the tone and like it and record with it. But "totally" satisfied...not really there yet.
"yet"?![]()
![]()
![]()
Vrad":tb2cqhvw said:LOL!Randy Van Sykes":tb2cqhvw said:Lots of people here could replace that word with 'ever'Vrad":tb2cqhvw said:amiller":tb2cqhvw said:Vrad":tb2cqhvw said:How about just boosting the Lonestar a bit?amiller":tb2cqhvw said:SpiritCrusher86":tb2cqhvw said:Mark IV's are said to have very vocal-like leads.amiller":tb2cqhvw said:Almoooooooosssst there.![]()
![]()
I like the XTC but it just falls short of having that vocal sound I want.
My Lonestar has the vocal tone I want but just falls short of having enough gain.
I like both amps...but no cigar. I don't know is there something in between those two amps?
I've got a Mark IV. I actually like the Lonestar more.
Yeah, I am boosting the Lonestar and it sounds really good...'just not quite enough aggression. I mean, I can live with the tone and like it and record with it. But "totally" satisfied...not really there yet.
"yet"?![]()
![]()
![]()
Yup. Don't get me wrong, getting new toys is fun. But yeah... after a while everything sounds the same and you keep the gear that has mojo. LOL!![]()
Well Timmons and Stevens have pretty different tones IMO. You already have Timmons. Stevens is a Marshall. Lots of upper mids. Not sure about Steffen Schackinger. Haven't heard him.amiller":18jp9z3c said:Vrad":18jp9z3c said:LOL!Randy Van Sykes":18jp9z3c said:Lots of people here could replace that word with 'ever'Vrad":18jp9z3c said:amiller":18jp9z3c said:Vrad":18jp9z3c said:How about just boosting the Lonestar a bit?amiller":18jp9z3c said:SpiritCrusher86":18jp9z3c said:Mark IV's are said to have very vocal-like leads.amiller":18jp9z3c said:Almoooooooosssst there.![]()
![]()
I like the XTC but it just falls short of having that vocal sound I want.
My Lonestar has the vocal tone I want but just falls short of having enough gain.
I like both amps...but no cigar. I don't know is there something in between those two amps?
I've got a Mark IV. I actually like the Lonestar more.
Yeah, I am boosting the Lonestar and it sounds really good...'just not quite enough aggression. I mean, I can live with the tone and like it and record with it. But "totally" satisfied...not really there yet.
"yet"?![]()
![]()
![]()
Yup. Don't get me wrong, getting new toys is fun. But yeah... after a while everything sounds the same and you keep the gear that has mojo. LOL!![]()
Actually, I have a pretty good idea of the tone I'm after. Somewhere between Andy Timmons, Steffen Schackinger(recorded stuff), Steve Stevens and me.![]()
![]()
Lately, I've been thinking about getting a Marshall of some type and having it modded to get me where I wanna be.
Vrad":sbmxj7tp said:...Well Timmons and Stevens have pretty different tones IMO. You already have Timmons. Stevens is a Marshall. Lots of upper mids. Not sure about Steffen Schackinger. Haven't heard him.
For Timmons you have the Lonestar.amiller":290lpnms said:Vrad":290lpnms said:...Well Timmons and Stevens have pretty different tones IMO. You already have Timmons. Stevens is a Marshall. Lots of upper mids. Not sure about Steffen Schackinger. Haven't heard him.
I agree, Timmons is NOT the same as Stevens. I like the sweetness of Timmons' tone and the aggression I hear in Stevens' tone. Schackinger is a bit closer to Stevens IMO. Like I wrote in another thread, if I could blend the Lonestar and XTC blue channel I think I would be close to what I'm looking for. I really think the only way I can get there is to get a Marshall (JMC 800 or SL) and have it modded.