SLO v XTC v Marsha..........

  • Thread starter Thread starter supersonic
  • Start date Start date
I liked the Marsha the best, then the SLO then the XTC. all sounded pretty good though
 
Didn't notice much difference in the Marsha and XTC on the clip. Although, owning both I know there is quite a bit when playing them. The SLO was definitely not as open as the other two.

Steve
 
The XTC was my least favorite. The SLO sounded slightly more articulate than the Marsha to my ears but I would be happy with either the SLO or the Marsha.

Would you mind sharing your settings on the SLO and the Marsha? I've got a friend with both amps and I'd like to try your settings in person.
 
For me it was Marsha first, then tie between XTC and SLO.

The Marsha is just perfect IMO. Open and crunchy, yet just saturated enough.

XTC has that sweet midrange and nice bloom

SLO is super tight and chunky but not as open

Oh, and did I mention F you! That's for owning 3 amps that I gas for on a regular basis. :gethim:
 
1) Marsha...
2) Bogner...
v

v

v

v

3.5) Soldano...

But... Settings!!! You gotta crank the Presence on the Bogner to get the juice!!!

Nice playing!! :thumbsup:

Keith
 
None of 'em sounded bad.

Kinda a tie for me with the SLO and Marsha.
 
Marsha, Marsha, Marsha! :rock:

They all sounded good in their own way, but overall I liked Marsha the best.
 
Yet another Marsha vote here. I found the SLO to sound darker than I recall from my experience with them.
 
Marsha, but that SLO clip sounded really dark and not like an SLO at all IMO...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top