
misterspockyall
Member
Rdodson":dhuqs6u1 said:Too many smart guys with good gear and good ears who are afraid to post because of the barrage of crap they'd receive. Talked to one just the other day on Reverb.
yup
Rdodson":dhuqs6u1 said:Too many smart guys with good gear and good ears who are afraid to post because of the barrage of crap they'd receive. Talked to one just the other day on Reverb.
JB6464":34t41hmo said:I just wish for once someone would do a vid of the new SLO tuned at standard A440 , and play different styles of lead and rhythm guitar parts clean to dirty .
Not everyone these days plays detuned with chuga chuga raw gain and leads with effects .
And turn the damn MV UP to atleast 6-7 , the SLO does'nt open up and start to sing until you actually drive the power section .
Krull said:That’s the problem with Reza’s clips. This amp sounds like all the others he’s posted. There is no diversity in his playing, plays the same riffs over and over again. The amp sounds like him. I can’t tell the difference between any of his clips.
I feel the same way. I’ve watched alot of his clips because of the amps played thru. All sound very similar..
someone will, yeah the chugging shit is fine but do all the other stuff too thats not a "amp test" cranking the gain on the crunch channel and chugging away is stupid..JB6464":4rjzcf4b said:I just wish for once someone would do a vid of the new SLO tuned at standard A440 , and play different styles of lead and rhythm guitar parts clean to dirty .
Not everyone these days plays detuned with chuga chuga raw gain and leads with effects .
And turn the damn MV UP to atleast 6-7 , the SLO does'nt open up and start to sing until you actually drive the power section .
Krull":wvr24lnb said:Classic Rezamatix meltdown over at Guitar Gear Forum.![]()
![]()
Makes youtube video. Hypes up amp. Argues with people not liking sound of amp. Equates price to tone. Lists amp on Reverb for sale next day.![]()
https://www.guitargearforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=47848
https://reverb.com/item/33307198-soldano-slo-100-2020
Personally I would not lead with such presumptions, when you haven't heard the new ones.Mr. Willy":392hv8j1 said:I’m in the camp that the new ones won’t sound as good as the old ones. Until I have the chance to play a new one side by side with an old one, that’s just my opinion. I could totally be wrong on that, but I think those original transformers do make a difference.
Speeddemon":224ebz8e said:Personally I would not lead with such presumptions, when you haven't heard the new ones.Mr. Willy":224ebz8e said:I’m in the camp that the new ones won’t sound as good as the old ones. Until I have the chance to play a new one side by side with an old one, that’s just my opinion. I could totally be wrong on that, but I think those original transformers do make a difference.
Just because everyone and their grandma has hyped up the DeYoungs in the past, does that suddenly make it 'to be expected that the new ones will suck'?
![]()
I'm not slagging the SLO at all. And you did say "won't sound as good..." . Maybe my use of 'suck' was too strong, but semantics...Mr. Willy":19c41t9y said:Speeddemon":19c41t9y said:Personally I would not lead with such presumptions, when you haven't heard the new ones.Mr. Willy":19c41t9y said:I’m in the camp that the new ones won’t sound as good as the old ones. Until I have the chance to play a new one side by side with an old one, that’s just my opinion. I could totally be wrong on that, but I think those original transformers do make a difference.
Just because everyone and their grandma has hyped up the DeYoungs in the past, does that suddenly make it 'to be expected that the new ones will suck'?
![]()
When did I say the new ones would suck? I never said that. I know I’m being presumptuous, hence why I left the “I could be wrong” caveat. There’s a consistent group of guys here who slag the SLO every chance they get. It’s so stupid and old, but it is what it is. Most of those guys probably like to hide behind walls of gain, and that’s fine. Those DeYoungs ARE special. There IS something different about them. That’s my experience when I play my SLO next to most amps when they’re cranked. I don’t care if you or anybody else disagrees. It’s only my opinion. You’re free to have yours.
Speeddemon":11alkb9i said:I'm not slagging the SLO at all. And you did say "won't sound as good..." . Maybe my use of 'suck' was too strong, but semantics...Mr. Willy":11alkb9i said:Speeddemon":11alkb9i said:Personally I would not lead with such presumptions, when you haven't heard the new ones.Mr. Willy":11alkb9i said:I’m in the camp that the new ones won’t sound as good as the old ones. Until I have the chance to play a new one side by side with an old one, that’s just my opinion. I could totally be wrong on that, but I think those original transformers do make a difference.
Just because everyone and their grandma has hyped up the DeYoungs in the past, does that suddenly make it 'to be expected that the new ones will suck'?
![]()
When did I say the new ones would suck? I never said that. I know I’m being presumptuous, hence why I left the “I could be wrong” caveat. There’s a consistent group of guys here who slag the SLO every chance they get. It’s so stupid and old, but it is what it is. Most of those guys probably like to hide behind walls of gain, and that’s fine. Those DeYoungs ARE special. There IS something different about them. That’s my experience when I play my SLO next to most amps when they’re cranked. I don’t care if you or anybody else disagrees. It’s only my opinion. You’re free to have yours.
I'm merely stating that I would be careful with presumptions about something you haven't been able to compare.
And I'm sure the DeYoungs are special, but your statement 'there is something different about them' would suggest you have compared multiple SLO's with different trannies. If not, it's an empty statement. Different to what?![]()
We're living in the 21st century, would you consider it completely impossible that some other trannie company cannot create something similar or dare I say, even better, using their drawings, material-choice, etc.?
And this ties in with the consistent group who slag the newer version of product X v2.0 or 3.0, insisting that 'the older ones are always better' That's so stupid and old.![]()
See what I did there?
It only helps people wanting to sell their 'old' version. The whole reason why 'pre-BAD' SLO's were going for insane prices for a short while. All 'dem folks were betting on the 'the newer ones don't have DeYoungs, ergo, they can't be that good'.
![]()
Mr. Willy":1uzgj3ve said:I see what you did there. You’re a very clever person. Very, very clever.
You’re putting words in my mouth AGAIN. I didn’t slag the newer version as sounding bad or “sucking” as you accused me of.
Fair enough, with a few caveats;Mr. Willy":1uzgj3ve said:My opinion, which I’m sorry seems to bug you so much, comes from hearing several SLO clones against a real one. I also owned an Avenger, which was touted as the exact circuit of the lead channel of the SLO. It didn’t sound like a SLO, either. Did it sound good? Yep. Did those clones sound good, yes. Some of them sounded very good. But not none of them sounded like the real thing.
Speeddemon":363e30y5 said:Mr. Willy":363e30y5 said:I see what you did there. You’re a very clever person. Very, very clever.
You’re putting words in my mouth AGAIN. I didn’t slag the newer version as sounding bad or “sucking” as you accused me of.
Again semantics, Mr. Willy. You literally said:
I’m in the camp that the new ones won’t sound as good as the old ones.
"Not as good" typically does not implicate 'just different'. It implicates...worse....'bad' even.
I already said my use of the word 'suck' may have been too strong; it would be nice if you similarly would own up to perhaps a too strong of choice of words on your part, instead of seemingly carelessly ending your previous post with a way more neutral: "I still don’t think the new ones will sound like the old ones."
That statement can be read as 'it just sounds different, not better or worse', indeed. Your original, to which I initially responded, did not.
Personally, I'm more in the camp of "Maybe the new ones will sound different, due to the absence of the DeYoungs...oh, and the replacement of the fx-loop, additional functionality, etc.... Maybe Mike knows what he's doing and they sound the same. I'll give my conclusion once I'm able to A/B an old and a new one." Until then, it's purely guess work.
Fair enough, with a few caveats;Mr. Willy":363e30y5 said:My opinion, which I’m sorry seems to bug you so much, comes from hearing several SLO clones against a real one. I also owned an Avenger, which was touted as the exact circuit of the lead channel of the SLO. It didn’t sound like a SLO, either. Did it sound good? Yep. Did those clones sound good, yes. Some of them sounded very good. But not none of them sounded like the real thing.
-Avenger is not a SLO
-the clones weren't made by Mike S./BAD
This SLO v2.0 *is* designed by him, including the upgraded/changed parts of the circuit and component-choice.
You'd think that the guy who invented this legendary beast, knows what makes it tick and what would make it 'tock'.![]()
Mr. Willy":36oxo876 said:I think the new ones look cheap. They look like kit SLO clones.