RaceU4her
Well-known member
Our local amp guru who’s the area Mesa tech told me use JJ’s
Well, there's your answer...I avoid Mk IIIs like the plague since the 2 I tried long ago were so harsh/abrasive in the upper mids/highs....ugh. You can have them. Mk IV, only tried one in a store and really liked it...far more than the JP2C that I went there to try. So, my experience with gigging Marks were 2C and 2C+s. Not the 2 that you have experience with.I've never really had a problem cutting against a Marshall with my old Mark III and IV so I call user error on that. It's been years since I was in a band though. Too much low end will cover your mid range, as well as too much saturation. I find it's best not to use the pull bright in a band as well, gives the tone more definition if it's pushed in, like a low pass filter of sorts. I do agree that the old IIC+ gain structure might be too smooth to cut well against some Marshall's though, especially at higher gain settings.
Problem with this is, none of the reissues you mention are on par with the originals. The vintage guitars 99% of the time sound and play better than any reissue. None of the new reissue Marshall plexis sound anywhere near as good as a 68 Superlead. I've played a few 2203xs....any 82/83 2203 smokes them. The JP2C? Puhleeze. Not even CLOSE to a real deal C+. Celestions? I've had resissue GBs, 65s, and have had 4 cabs with original 65s, and still have 8 Pulsonic GBs. No, the reissues DO NOT sound very close at all to the real deal vintage Celestions.+1.
There is a long, long history of this. Here are some items 'reissued' items in recent decades that have done anything but drive the price of the OG's down.
- most Gibsons
- most Fenders
- most Marshalls
- most Fenders
- most Mesas
- all Celestions
The quality or authenticity of the reissue doesn't seem to be much of a factor in this argument - people just want cool old shit.
There you have it. Put a real Mullard or JJ ECC803 in V1 and perfection awaits. Of course the RI slays, it has Ed’s recommended glassware compliment!My DR RI & HRG RI are all Mesa JJs.
As long as they're healthy, the microphone could care less about tubes.There you have it. Put a real Mullard or JJ ECC803 in V1 and perfection awaits. Of course the RI slays, it has Ed’s recommended glassware compliment!
My friend, do not underestimate the power of tube rolling. In this amp, it may not make much of a difference BUT you'll never know until you try.As long as they're healthy, the microphone could care less about tubes.
I have yet to hear clip comparisons with the RI against the top of the crop that ends the discussion. Let's hear a triple and some of its variants. The RI may dominate but I want to hear it put to the test.
Tom you've, IIRC, never reamped- all your opinions are based off your ears which are by their very nature inconsistent & tied to emotion. Send me your best tubes and I'll reamp them with whatever guitar & amp I have that you want to hear.My friend, do not underestimate the power of tube rolling. In this amp, it may not make much of a difference BUT you'll never know until you try.
Yes, this is a rabbit hole you have yet to go down.....![]()
Ya, I've never owned a C+. You're right about the III, they can be harsh. I had a red stripe. It was always a battle dialing in the highs.Well, there's your answer...I avoid Mk IIIs like the plague since the 2 I tried long ago were so harsh/abrasive in the upper mids/highs....ugh. You can have them. Mk IV, only tried one in a store and really liked it...far more than the JP2C that I went there to try. So, my experience with gigging Marks were 2C and 2C+s. Not the 2 that you have experience with.
In my experience only vintage amps really amplify a noticeable difference with tube rolling. With the vintage Rectos I've had, the only pre tube that made a difference was the Chinese 8th/9th gen which makes total sense since that's what Mesa used in the early 90s. Winged C EL34s sounded really great and better than the JJs one of them came with. I actually noticed more of a difference with the stock coke bottle rectifier tube vs the modern JJ GZ34...except, I never liked tube rectified mode vs Silicon.Tom you've, IIRC, never reamped- all your opinions are based off your ears which are by their very nature inconsistent & tied to emotion. Send me your best tubes and I'll reamp them with whatever guitar & amp I have that you want to hear.
I'll concede my Rivera sounded great with a 57 on a Mesa V30 and EXH 12AX7's, but it still had my underbiased JJ KT77's running at 220v B+...As long as they're healthy, the microphone could care less about tubes.
I mean I think reissues in general compare ok with the old stuff but let's face it, those classics are unbeatable for many reasons.Problem with this is, none of the reissues you mention are on par with the originals. The vintage guitars 99% of the time sound and play better than any reissue. None of the new reissue Marshall plexis sound anywhere near as good as a 68 Superlead. I've played a few 2203xs....any 82/83 2203 smokes them. The JP2C? Puhleeze. Not even CLOSE to a real deal C+. Celestions? I've had resissue GBs, 65s, and have had 4 cabs with original 65s, and still have 8 Pulsonic GBs. No, the reissues DO NOT sound very close at all to the real deal vintage Celestions.
Maybe you think all of these reissues compare well to the originals? If so, more power to ya. I however do not. There are obvious differences, not just cost, with every reissue you mention vs the OG.
The only exception to this are these new Gibson/Mesas. They actually are so good, many are selling/cashing in by moving the OG in favor of the reissues.
Fark, just saw the retail on these. $7500 is outrageous, and it probably comes with a long wait.I can buy a rev f here in Australia cheaper than I can buy a reissue
IMO the extra "cocked wah" mids the DR RI & HRG RI have are what make them sit much better live than their OG counterparts. That said, I can totally see why a bedroom / studio guy might prefer the more scooped OGs in both cases. Good thing we have both! Before these reissues I was about to abandon Mesas for live work and go over to @Racerxrated 's Marshall Dark Side.Interesting. I prefer the G - the RI has some honk in the mids I don't love. It's not glaring though and gets lost in the mix. Both sound cool, thanks for posting.
They definitely have great mids but I would hesitate to call it “cocked wah”. That always makeIMO the extra "cocked wah" mids the DR RI & HRG RI have are what make them sit much better live than their OG counterparts. That said, I can totally see why a bedroom / studio guy might prefer the more scooped OGs in both cases. Good thing we have both! Before these reissues I was about to abandon Mesas for live work and go over to @Racerxrated 's Marshall Dark Side.
"It would only take a nudge, to make you like me......mwahahahaha!"IMO the extra "cocked wah" mids the DR RI & HRG RI have are what make them sit much better live than their OG counterparts. That said, I can totally see why a bedroom / studio guy might prefer the more scooped OGs in both cases. Good thing we have both! Before these reissues I was about to abandon Mesas for live work and go over to @Racerxrated 's Marshall Dark Side.