Just went to 11.5 to .056

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chester Nimitz
  • Start date Start date
Chester Nimitz

Chester Nimitz

Banned
New member
H72617000000000-00-500x500.jpg



WOW .... havent played heavy electric strings in a long time.

Killer ... :thumbsup:
 
I play the EB skinny top heavy bottom and swap out the 52 for a 56, tuned to standard. Could never go back!
 
:thumbsup:

Just switched myself recently. Playing .013>.056 and like it a lot. My only gripe is having to set the action quite a bit higher and losing some playability.

Having Kiesel set up my new build with .012>.054. See how those go.
 
Nice and heavy. I usually play 11-54 or something like that on my 25.5" scale guitars. What scale length do you have it on?
 
I 'm running 13-56 on a 25" Pinch harmonics a a bit tougher on that 56.

Gonna try 12-54 on a 25.5"
 
JakeAC5253":2ezqtv5x said:
Nice and heavy. I usually play 11-54 or something like that on my 25.5" scale guitars. What scale length do you have it on?


3 LP's an SG, a 86' Charvel & an Epi 335.

I just ordered 6 more sets,

These strings are Meaty, they Rawk.

I have used GHS for 30 years, and the Nickel Rockers CL 9.5 to .048 for 11 years.

I had to adjust the Floyd springs on my Charvel but other than that everything is Amazing.

Even my GF said she could notice a dif when i play.

I see why Angus/AC/DC & SRV used heavy ...

Certain string bends @A-440 can be tough but my callluses & finger strength will increase.

The Charvel & 2 Pauls are E-flat. Originally i bought the heavys just for that but there was such a difference i went whole Hog.
 
MetalHeadMike":36kn6fqp said:
^^^
No shit, a 63!

What tuning?
.63 is A.

I calculate my strings via tension and note frequency.

No matter what tuning I am in my strings are always similar tension as a "standard" set tuned to E would be. I down tune and hate the runberband feel and loss of articulation.

I also match the tension across each string choosing guage by desired tension.

A buddy of mine went for increased tension and wound up at like .72 or similar lmao.
 
Gotch ya. I wouldn't mind trying a 60, but my action is already WAY higher than I'd prefer.

Feel and tone wise for drop C on this guitar, the 56 seems pretty good.

I looked at the tension guide when deciding what set to have Kiesel put on my current build and the 12-54s look like they should be relatively balanced across the set. I'm just hoping the action is still relatively low.
 
MetalHeadMike":3pj3h105 said:
Gotch ya. I wouldn't mind trying a 60, but my action is already WAY higher than I'd prefer.

Feel and tone wise for drop C on this guitar, the 56 seems pretty good.

I looked at the tension guide when deciding what set to have Kiesel put on my current build and the 12-54s look like they should be relatively balanced across the set. I'm just hoping the action is still relatively low.


I think my dropped C are around .56-.58 if I remember correctly. Should be good.
 
Damn those are too fat for my girly hands. I have to practice on acoustic regularly just so 10s feel good and slinky.

Just picked up a D'Addario Balanced Tension set but have not installed them. Looks like the B increases from .013 to .0135 and the
D and A both decrease by .001. Anybody love/hate the BT sets?
 
LP's an SG, a 86' Charvel & an Epi 335.

I just ordered 6 more sets,

These strings are Meaty, they Rawk.

I have used GHS for 30 years, and the Nickel Rockers CL 9.5 to .048 for 11 years.

I had to adjust the Floyd springs on my Charvel but other than that everything is Amazing.

Even my GF said she could notice a dif when i play.

I see why Angus/AC/DC & SRV used heavy ...

Certain string bends @A-440 can be tough but my callluses & finger strength will increase.

The Charvel & 2 Pauls are E-flat. Originally i bought the heavys just for that but there was such a difference i went whole Hog.

So you guys are slapping these heavy gauge strings on your axes and you dont feel the need to adjust your truss rod/necks????????? That wouldn't work on any guitar I own. The increase in tension surely increases the necks relief which is going to make your action higher. I mean, if thats what you like, more power to you, but I've never been a fan of too much relief in my necks......just makes it harder to play, which is not most peoples goal.
 
^^^
I absolutely adjusted the truss rod to proper relief but then from there I also had to adjust the action via the bridge. On the particular axe I'm trying the 12-56s on its a Floyd so there's no individual saddle height adjustment as you probably know. Like I said, I do not enjoy the extreme action height I wound up with; it does make playing rather trying.
 
^^^^^ Ok, that makes sense. I was just surprised nobody had mentioned adjusting the neck. About the topic in general, I've always liked the feel of heavier strings, especially when playing in a live situation where you might have a tendency to play more heavy handed than you normally would. My hands as i've gotten older just cant handle the tension like I once did. I gave in and am back to playing 9's now. :aww:
 
9-42 top wrapped on a Les Paul tuned to standard or down 1/2 a step.
:)
 
"Ok, that makes sense. I was just surprised nobody had mentioned adjusting the neck. About the topic in general, I've always liked the feel of heavier strings, especially when playing in a live situation where you might have a tendency to play more heavy handed than you normally would. My hands as i've gotten older just cant handle the tension like I once did. I gave in and am back to playing 9's now. :aww:"

I hear ya man. I worked outside in subzero temps with my hands for 13 years prior to quitting and returning to school, and my hands are shot. 10-52 tension was ideal for me in relation to my hand/finger strength, but the low string was a bit loose in Drop C and I was having tremolo picking death metal type stuff on the low string. The 13-56 is great int terms of tone and tension but my hands do tire quickly. I'm hoping the 12-54s will be a good compromise.
 
gtrwun":1svsgx80 said:
LP's an SG, a 86' Charvel & an Epi 335.

I just ordered 6 more sets,

These strings are Meaty, they Rawk.

I have used GHS for 30 years, and the Nickel Rockers CL 9.5 to .048 for 11 years.

I had to adjust the Floyd springs on my Charvel but other than that everything is Amazing.

Even my GF said she could notice a dif when i play.

I see why Angus/AC/DC & SRV used heavy ...

Certain string bends @A-440 can be tough but my callluses & finger strength will increase.

The Charvel & 2 Pauls are E-flat. Originally i bought the heavys just for that but there was such a difference i went whole Hog.

So you guys are slapping these heavy gauge strings on your axes and you dont feel the need to adjust your truss rod/necks????????? That wouldn't work on any guitar I own. The increase in tension surely increases the necks relief which is going to make your action higher. I mean, if thats what you like, more power to you, but I've never been a fan of too much relief in my necks......just makes it harder to play, which is not most peoples goal.
This year i had Professional fret-levels & setups on all my guitars [for the first time] and what a difference. If there is a need for a truss rod tweak i do it but its not a big deal. I am aware tho that the heavier gauge is more string tension on my Gibson headstocks and that one tip-over or drop will prolly spell disaster. Need to avoid that at all costs.
 

Similar threads

Shreddy Mercury
Replies
11
Views
481
bhuard75
bhuard75
phillybhatesme
Replies
67
Views
4K
Alpha Stryke
Alpha Stryke
E
Replies
40
Views
2K
marvcus
marvcus
Music&Chaos
Replies
23
Views
2K
TheGreatGreen
TheGreatGreen
Back
Top