The Gear Page is such a garbage forum.

[Robostyle]

This is the quality content I came here for.

What is your TGP handle?

 

[NoHassle]

You operate on nothing but emotional bias, this is peak irony lmfao. Wow.

Evidence otherwise you're full of shit...as you have been to date.

I 'sense' you're getting ready for the acid test with the Captain...is that correct?

 

[NoHassle]

What is your TGP handle?

NOT Homostyle like yours is.

 

[VonBonfire]

Evidence otherwise you're full of shit...as you have been to date.

I 'sense' you're getting ready for the acid test with the Captain...is that correct?

Your politically oriented posts seem (fairly) well thought out but your reactions to strong disagreements are probably the most emotionally charged of anyone on the board.

 

[NoHassle]

Your politically oriented posts seem (fairly) well thought out but your reactions to strong disagreements are probably the most emotionally charged of anyone on the board.

Do not agree in the slightest.

Show me please.

 

[VonBonfire]

Do not agree in the slightest.

Show me please.

Your routine remarks about sodomizing people who disagree strongly with your points makes it self evident. I would liken it to you pulling out a gun because someone snapped you with a rubber band. Maybe you don't agree but I think most everyone else on the board sees it. If I am wrong, fine, but it still means you are perceived as coming off that way to me and others.

 

[Robostyle]

NOT Homostyle like yours is.

 

[MadAsAHatter]

Look...because you're now impotent you old cunt don't begrudge others still talking about sex.

Get an Icy Pole stick and use it as a splint and you'll be as good as gold again.

Stop your whining you jealous fool.

I don't really care if people talk about sex. I just can't think of a legitimate reason how saying you want to sodomize dudes assholes and stuff as above makes everyone else gay.

Picasso mentioned my golf tan avatar a few times. Obviously I knew why. Now we all do.

Kinda strange though how you went from a comment about a golf tan avatar straight to graphic detail of a guy sucking your toes and it's the other person who's gay.

 

[Harry Dunne]

What is your TGP handle?

Tag

 

[VonBonfire]

Tag

Post pics of your "brazzy" board PRS as proof.

 

[Harry Dunne]

I don't really care if people talk about sex. I just can't think of a legitimate reason how saying you want to sodomize dudes assholes and stuff as above makes everyone else gay.


Kinda strange though how you went from a comment about a golf tan avatar straight to graphic detail of a guy sucking your toes and it's the other person who's gay.

 

[Alpha Stryke]

WHO KNEW ...... I MEAN LIKE EVERYBODY LIKE FOREVER.

 

[IndyWS6]

Aint nuttin wrong with @The~Kid
and hes not the trolling problem

There is so much wrong with Kid, it defies a response…

 

[NoHassle]

Your routine remarks about sodomizing people who disagree strongly with your points makes it self evident. I would liken it to you pulling out a gun because someone snapped you with a rubber band. Maybe you don't agree but I think most everyone else on the board sees it. If I am wrong, fine, but it still means you are perceived as coming off that way to me and others.

To start with that's purely subjective on your part...it most certainly is not the intent in any sense of the word.

My 'outrageous' posts are exactly that, outrageous to show the absurdity of many people's posts and to ignite an exchange.

I don't think like you and I realise that and post accordingly. You're looking at me through your value set and behaviours, step outside of that to truly see and appreciate a difference. Whether you like that or not is entirely up to you.

Of course, many see me as you stated because of the hive mentality here...look at the common attacks on Dan alone and the hive mentality is clear and present. We then look at Picasso's bullshit and how many (aka: hive) join in and do what he does too. The hive mentality and common viewing is strongly evident. (I guess shit finds other shit and sticks with it )

Again, I will say I am not in agreement with your assertion of being emotional. I 100% support being emotional where appropriate as it's part of every human's behaviour set. There is nothing wrong whatsoever with being emotional if that's how you need to express yourself at the time. But again, you have misread and that's generated your assertion.

If you don't agree with the above read it a few times over, if you still don't agree I'm comfortable with that. When being subjective you're better off by not accusing me as you will most likely be incorrect as again, I don't think and act like you do.

 

[VonBonfire]

To start with that's purely subjective on your part...it most certainly is not the intent in any sense of the word.

It's not subjective though. Someone disagrees with you and gets a bit chippy and you respond with full tilt remarks about sodomizing them. It's a direct observation of your behavior.

My 'outrageous' posts are exactly that, outrageous to show the absurdity of many people's posts and to ignite an exchange.

They aren't just outrageous, they are lewd and vulgar to the extreme.

I don't think like you and I realise that and post accordingly. You're looking at me through your value set and behaviours, step outside of that to truly see and appreciate a difference. Whether you like that or not is entirely up to you.

Not really. I'm just looking at you like a guy who has a hard time getting his point across without stooping to the most grotesque insults you can muster. See response #1 in this post.

Of course, many see me as you stated because of the hive mentality here...look at the common attacks on Dan alone and the hive mentality is clear and present. We then look at Picasso's bullshit and how many (aka: hive) join in and do what he does too. The hive mentality and common viewing is strongly evident. (I guess shit finds other shit and sticks with it )

Many see you as I stated because I stated what is obvious. It has nothing to do with hive mentality and everything to do with your posting style.

 

[NoHassle]

It's not subjective though. Someone disagrees with you and gets a bit chippy and you respond with full tilt remarks about sodomizing them. It's a direct observation of your behavior.


They aren't just outrageous, they are lewd and vulgar to the extreme.


Not really. I'm just looking at you like a guy who has a hard time getting his point across without stooping to the most grotesque insults you can muster. See response #1 in this post.


Many see you as I stated because I stated what is obvious. It has nothing to do with hive mentality and everything to do with your posting style.

Okay then...you've had your reply and clearly what I wrote is not in line with your thoughts...all good.

Best we avoid each other now as I can't be bothered dealing with you going forward.

No emotion...just being pragmatic.

 

[VonBonfire]

Okay then...you've had your reply and clearly what I wrote is not in line with your thoughts...all good.

Best we avoid each other now as I can't be bothered dealing with you going forward.

No emotion...just being pragmatic.

Pragmatic would be you exiting the board like you did the last time but that's a decision only you can make. I don't think you do very well dealing with the majority of members down in OT and it seems to be mostly a source of irritation for you. I mostly avoid you already because of your inability to control your language during a disagreement which is what formed the basis of my past few posts that I tried to enlighten you about. What I've gathered from our talk is you think that kind of language is acceptable but it's not. I guess in summary it's not a good way to meet new people and make friends which is kind of the point of rig talk, but that's just my opinion I suppose. Be well.

 

[MadAsAHatter]

I just want to add a bit of extra commentary to @VonBonfire responses...

To start with that's purely subjective on your part...it most certainly is not the intent in any sense of the word.

It's not subjective though. Someone disagrees with you and gets a bit chippy and you respond with full tilt remarks about sodomizing them. It's a direct observation of your behavior.

It gets more objective when the bulk of regular frequenters to OTC have made this observation. If not the intent to bring things to the extreme why immediately go there?

My 'outrageous' posts are exactly that, outrageous to show the absurdity of many people's posts and to ignite an exchange.

They aren't just outrageous, they are lewd and vulgar to the extreme.

There's much better ways to ignite an exchange than going straight to rhetoric of graphic sexing assholes. Of course there's always going to be some mudslinging in OTC, but if Hassle actually wants to start up a true exchange of ideas using extreme insults isn't really the way to go about it. Doing that reads as not wanting to have any semblance of a conversatuon.

I don't think like you and I realise that and post accordingly. You're looking at me through your value set and behaviours, step outside of that to truly see and appreciate a difference. Whether you like that or not is entirely up to you.

Not really. I'm just looking at you like a guy who has a hard time getting his point across without stooping to the most grotesque insults you can muster. See response #1 in this post.

It's not just Hassle having a hard time getting his point across without stooping to grotesques insults. Hassle presents himself in a way that says he is unable to cope with opinions that are different. In most instance Hassle goes straight to outbursts & graphic insults. OTS will lsways have mudslinging and I'm trying to not say this in a mean way, but it all comes off as someone who doesn't have the mental capacity to defend their position in a rational way.

Of course, many see me as you stated because of the hive mentality here...look at the common attacks on Dan alone and the hive mentality is clear and present. We then look at Picasso's bullshit and how many (aka: hive) join in and do what he does too. The hive mentality and common viewing is strongly evident. (I guess shit finds other shit and sticks with it )

Many see you as I stated because I stated what is obvious. It has nothing to do with hive mentality and everything to do with your posting style.

I'll say that several regulars (including myself) hold similar values, but it certainly isn't hive mentality. Throughout the years those that Hassle considers "hive" have had disagreements. The difference is we've been able to say our side and at worst agree to disagree without resorting to becoming "enemies". Hassle references Picasso's "bullshit", but when you really look at it how many regulars actually jump on the heart the cock bandwagon rhetoric. Most form their opinions and push back regardless of what Picasso says/does. In all honestly a lot of people find Picasso's constant heart the cock a little juvenile and tiresome. But he's also not trying to be purposely disruptive to OTC like some others so no one really gives a shit and just scrolls past it.

Again, I will say I am not in agreement with your assertion of being emotional. I 100% support being emotional where appropriate as it's part of every human's behaviour set. There is nothing wrong whatsoever with being emotional if that's how you need to express yourself at the time. But again, you have misread and that's generated your assertion.

A serious question for you Hassle... Can you honestly look back at all the outbursts you've had (meaning going straight to graphic insults without anything resembling a rebuttal or argument) and think the reading of them from others was off base? Put yourself on the other side of the coin. How would your read it if someone responded in they way you do with others.

If you don't agree with the above read it a few times over, if you still don't agree I'm comfortable with that. When being subjective you're better off by not accusing me as you will most likely be incorrect as again, I don't think and act like you do.

It's pretty obvious you have a completely view of yourself than how others view you. I'm not meaning this in an insulting way but it goes back to that saying of when everyone else is the problem. If you're okay with that then good for you. Just don't be surprised and offended when people keep giving you shit for acting like a perceived douchebag.

 

[NoHassle]

Well, you're the person spending his free time fantasizing about it on a guitar forum anyway.

Meanwhile, I spend most of my free time blowing shit up.

FYI....you may be interested

Russian arms giant showcases pioneering anti-drone rounds​

​

A pioneering Russian anti-drone round, which uses special three-element bullets in standard small-arms munitions, has been showcased in a new video released by the defense conglomerate Rostec.​

Mnogotochie is a variant of a multiple-projectile cartridge for rifled weapons. Each bullet consists of three stacked elements made from a special bronze-like alloy. The spin gives them sufficient stability to be compatible with muzzle brakes, unlike shotgun rounds, while the spread increases the chances of hitting and disabling a small FPV drone.

According to the developer, a Russian producer of precision firearms with expertise in specialized munitions, a 5.45x39mm Mnogotochie round remains effective at ranges of up to 150 meters, while its larger 7.62x54mm version is suited for twice that distance.

https://www.rt.com/russia/642536-anti-drone-rounds-rostec/

 

[Floyd Eye]

FYI....you may be interested

Russian arms giant showcases pioneering anti-drone rounds​

​

A pioneering Russian anti-drone round, which uses special three-element bullets in standard small-arms munitions, has been showcased in a new video released by the defense conglomerate Rostec.​

Mnogotochie is a variant of a multiple-projectile cartridge for rifled weapons. Each bullet consists of three stacked elements made from a special bronze-like alloy. The spin gives them sufficient stability to be compatible with muzzle brakes, unlike shotgun rounds, while the spread increases the chances of hitting and disabling a small FPV drone.

According to the developer, a Russian producer of precision firearms with expertise in specialized munitions, a 5.45x39mm Mnogotochie round remains effective at ranges of up to 150 meters, while its larger 7.62x54mm version is suited for twice that distance.

https://www.rt.com/russia/642536-anti-drone-rounds-rostec/

I've thus far resisted the urge to check out any drone shotgun rounds out. I will eventually, but not until I put together an appropriate program to test them. I do reload and have done some interesting things I'll not go into.